ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2025
Association Between Preoperative Patient-Reported Questionnaires and Outcomes After Ulnar Collateral Ligament Surgery.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: While surgical interventions for ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries in throwing athletes have improved return-to-sport rates, predicting individual recovery timelines and the risk of complications remains a challenge. The influence of a patient's preoperative status, captured through patient-reported outcomes (PROs), on postoperative recovery milestones and complication risks is not well-defined. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to determine if baseline PROs and specific surgical variables predict critical postoperative milestones and adverse outcomes following UCL surgery. It was hypothesized that better baseline PROs would be associated with improved postoperative outcomes. Study Design: Cohort study: Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Data for this study were obtained from The Pitch Registry, a multi-institutional database of baseball players with UCL injuries, analysis conducted between 2019 and 2023. Of 506 screened patients, 146 were included based on having ≥2 years of follow-up and complete preoperative PROs. Baseline PROs, including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic (KJOC) score, and Youth Throwing Score (YTS), were collected. Postoperative outcomes, including time to return to throwing (RTT) and return to mound (RTM), and the presence of surgical complications, were documented. Intraoperative variables, such as the type of UCL procedure (repair or reconstruction), were also recorded. Results: A total of 146 patients were included for analysis, and their surgical breakdown included 39 (26.7%) repairs, 69 (47.3%) palmaris reconstructions, and 38 (26.0%) gracilis reconstructions. Reported level of play included high school (30%), college (56%), minor league professional (10%), and major league professional (1%). Better baseline total ASES scores were significantly associated with a faster RTT (coefficient -0.09 weeks/point; Conclusion: Better baseline PROs, particularly better total ASES scores and better ASES intensity of pain scores, are associated with faster RTT and a reduced risk of postoperative complications and adverse events following UCL surgery. UCL repair was associated with significantly faster RTT and RTM timelines compared to reconstruction with either palmaris or gracilis autografts. These findings suggest that specific preoperative PROs can aid surgeons in managing patient expectations and counseling regarding postoperative recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.