Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41415168›Full record

ArticlePlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)2025

Boosting leaf trait estimation from reflectance spectra by elucidating the transferability of PLSR models.

Jiatong Wang, Xiaoqiang Liu, Xiaotian Qi, Xiaoyong Wu, Yilin Long, Yuhao Feng, Qi Dong, Jiabo Yan, Liwen Huang, Yue Luo and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Jiatong WangState Key Laboratory of Forage Breeding-by-Design and Utilization, Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xiaoqiang LiuState Key Laboratory of Forage Breeding-by-Design and Utilization, Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xiaotian QiState Key Laboratory of Forage Breeding-by-Design and Utilization, Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xiaoyong WuState Key Laboratory of Forage Breeding-by-Design and Utilization, Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yilin LongState Key Laboratory of Forage Breeding-by-Design and Utilization, Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yuhao FengSchool of Biological Sciences and Institute for Climate and Carbon Neutrality, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, China.
Qi DongState Key Laboratory of Forage Breeding-by-Design and Utilization, Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Jiabo YanState Key Laboratory of Forage Breeding-by-Design and Utilization, Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Liwen HuangState Key Laboratory of Forage Breeding-by-Design and Utilization, Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yue LuoState Key Laboratory of Forage Breeding-by-Design and Utilization, Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Mengqi CaoState Key Laboratory of Forage Breeding-by-Design and Utilization, Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Kai XuState Key Laboratory of Forage Breeding-by-Design and Utilization, Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Changming ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Forage Breeding-by-Design and Utilization, Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yang WangState Key Laboratory of Forage Breeding-by-Design and Utilization, Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Tianyu HuState Key Laboratory of Forage Breeding-by-Design and Utilization, Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Jin WuSchool of Biological Sciences and Institute for Climate and Carbon Neutrality, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, China.
Lingli LiuState Key Laboratory of Forage Breeding-by-Design and Utilization, Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yanjun SuState Key Laboratory of Forage Breeding-by-Design and Utilization, Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leaf spectroscopy, combined with partial least squares regression (PLSR), is recognized as an efficient and precise tool for measuring plant leaf traits. However, the feasibility of developing a generalizable model remains unclear, primarily due to limited understanding of PLSR model transferability. Here, we collected six key leaf traits along with paired leaf reflectance spectra from 1967 samples of 349 tree species in eight forest sites across China. Using this dataset, we explored the transferability of PLSR models, factors affecting model transferability, and the feasibility of developing generalizable PLSR models for leaf trait prediction. Overall, PLSR models trained at a specific study site demonstrate limited transferability to other study sites. Dissimilarities in plant evolutionary history and environmental conditions between study sites are the primary factors influencing the transferability of PLSR models. Incorporating training data from diverse evolutionary histories and environmental conditions can improve the transferability of PLSR models, achieving accuracy equivalent to that of site-specific models. Our findings provide guidelines for the use of spectroscopy in leaf trait prediction and underscore the urgent need for collaborative efforts to build an open database of leaf traits and reflectance spectra, thereby promoting the development of universal PLSR models for plant leaf trait prediction.

Indexed as

Evolutionary historyLeaf reflectance spectraLeaf traitsPartial least-squares regression (PLSR)Transferability

Identifiers

PMID41415168
PMCPMC12709916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.