ArticleJournal of mid-life health
The Evaluation of Psychometric Properties of the Women's Health-enabling Factors Questionnaire among Menopausal Women.
Article in Journal of mid-life health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Enabling factors help women to overcome financial and structural barriers to health care, thereby enhancing their ability to access services and adopt healthy behaviors. Unfortunately, there is a lack of data regarding these enabling factors. This study aimed to examine the validity and reliability of the Women's Health-Enabling Factors Questionnaire (WHEFQ) in Iranian menopausal women as well as determine its interrelationship. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 571 menopausal women to assess the psychometric properties, including construct validity. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used for this purpose. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's α and McDonald's Omega. The study also investigated the predictive value of the model and the relationships between various constructs. Data analysis was performed using SPSS v. 27 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and AMOS v. 24 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) software. Results: The construct validity was assessed using EFA, which resulted in the identification of 14 items distributed across four subscales. These subscales explained for 55.17% of the total variance. The CFA displayed a strong model fit, with indices such as root mean square error of approximation = 0.02, goodness of fit index (GFI) =0.97, adjusted GFI = 0.95, comparative fit index = 0.98, normed fit index = 0.93, Tucker-Lewis Index = 0.98, incremental fit index = 0.98, and RMR = 0.03 ( Conclusions: The WHEFQ, which consists of 10 items, has been validated and proven reliable for assessing health-enabling factors in Iranian menopausal women. The findings indicate that personal resources are significantly associated with social facilities and skills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.