ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2025
Nomogram for predicting postpartum pelvic floor dysfunction based on ultrasound and serum biomarkers FGF2 and HBP.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Transperineal ultrasound-based outcomes of postpartum pelvic floor recovery after elective cesarean section versus vaginal delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in global women's health · 2026Pooled it
- Risk Factors and Nomogram for Postpartum Myofascial Pelvic Pain: A Prospective Cohort Study.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
- Increased serum fibroblast growth factor 2 levels, altered peripheral blood inflammatory indicators and their ratios in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a clinical exploratory study.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the utility of pelvic floor ultrasound combined with serum fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) and heparin-binding protein (HBP) in assessing postpartum pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD), and to construct a nomogram model for prognostic prediction.
methodsA retrospective study included 149 primiparous women at 42 days postpartum who underwent pelvic floor ultrasound at Wenzhou Central Hospital from January 2020 to December 2021. Participants were divided into a control group (cesarean section, 68 cases) and an observation group (vaginal delivery, 81 cases). Baseline characteristics, ultrasound parameters, and serum FGF2 and HBP levels were recorded. Incidence of PFD, defined as pelvic organ prolapse or stress urinary incontinence, was documented during 3-year follow-up. Correlations were analyzed, and univariate and multivariate logistic regression identified independent predictors. A nomogram was constructed and validated using ROC, calibration, and decision curve analyses.
resultsAbnormal pelvic floor ultrasound findings were more frequent after vaginal delivery (64.2% vs. 52.9%). Quantitative ultrasound indices were significantly higher in the observation group, while serum FGF2 and HBP levels were significantly lower (all P < 0.05). Ultrasound indicators were negatively correlated with biomarker levels. During follow-up, 61 PFD cases occurred in the observation group and 22 in the control group. Independent risk factors included age ≥ 30 years, prenatal BMI ≥ 27 kg/m
conclusionUltrasound combined with serum FGF2 and HBP enables comprehensive assessment of postpartum pelvic floor function. The nomogram model provides accurate risk prediction and may guide early identification and intervention in high-risk women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.