ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Sex-specific infarct volume associations and early prediction of language impairment progression following stroke surgery: a network approach.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Post-stroke language impairment affects nearly one-third of acute stroke patients or 30% of ischemic stroke patients, yet predicting its progression remains challenging due to multifactorial recovery processes. Methods: Predictors were selected using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression. The interrelationships among these predictors and their mechanistic links to gender and post-stroke language impairment were subsequently explored employing Graphical LASSO (GLASSO) and Bayesian network analysis. Furthermore, Network Outcome Analysis (NOA) was applied to investigate the associations between preoperative predictors and the severity of postoperative language impairment deterioration. Results: LASSO identified eight predictors for inclusion in the model. The ROC analysis demonstrated favorable predictive efficacy (AUC = 0.80 [95% CI: 0.719-0.876], accuracy = 0.73, sensitivity = 0.78, specificity = 0.69, PPV = 0.71, NPV = 0.76). The DCA results (probability range: 0-0.81, 0.91) further indicated good clinical utility of the model. Preoperative GCS emerged as the primary direct predictor. Although male patients exhibited larger infarct volumes (22.72 mL vs. 15.19 mL in females), this difference was not directly associated with poorer language outcomes. Discussion: This multimodal model, enhanced by network analysis, accurately predicts language impairment progression and highlights preoperative consciousness as a key mediator, supporting precision stroke rehabilitation by capturing complex predictor interrelationships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.