ReviewFrontiers in neurology2025
Functional MRI in optic neuritis: insights into cortical modulation and possible recovery mechanisms.
Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine Learning Integrating SERF-MEG and VEP for Diagnosis and Differential Diagnosis of Optic Neuropathies.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Optic neuritis (ON) is an inflammatory, demyelinating optic neuropathy commonly associated with multiple sclerosis. It typically presents as monocular visual loss, with most visual functions recovering within several weeks. In addition to spontaneous remyelination, brain adaptation is thought to contribute to the recovery process. In this review, we discuss the role of functional MRI (fMRI) as a powerful tool for examining the cortical changes associated with ON. We explore studies that utilize a range of fMRI methodologies, highlighting their findings and implications for understanding cortical adaptation and recovery following peripheral visual loss. The review begins with traditional block-design fMRI protocols which assess activation strength in response to visual stimuli. It then shifts to analytical approaches that examine resting-state connectivity within the visual system. Advanced techniques, including population receptive field and connective field analyses, are also discussed, emphasizing their ability to probe neuronal spatial properties and detect changes following ON. Finally, we consider emerging fMRI methods that capture the temporal dynamics of cortical activity, underscoring their relevance for elucidating the time-dependent processes underlying cortical adaptation after ON.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.