ArticleInternational health2026
How sustainable are self-help interventions in the post-funding period? Qualitative findings from integrated leprosy communities in Nigeria.
Article in International health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTime-limited, externally funded self-help groups (receiving training, equipment and access to seeds) are typically evaluated during the funding period. However, their sustainability beyond this phase remains understudied.
methodsThis retrospective qualitative study explored the post-funding sustainability of two 6-y self-help interventions (2013-2019) for groups in integrated leprosy communities in central Nigeria. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 40 stakeholders (beneficiaries, implementers and funders) and supplemented by document analysis.
resultsFindings revealed that most activities ceased after funding ended, with limited evidence of sustained benefits. In one community, sewing initiatives persisted, while the other showed no lasting impact. Challenges included inadequate maintenance of provided equipment (e.g. sewing machines, tricycles) and systemic barriers such as insecure land tenure and limited educational access.
conclusionsThe study highlights the fragility of externally funded self-help models in marginalised communities. Sustainability requires integration with broader economic systems and infrastructure support. Funders should prioritise long-term planning alongside short-term interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.