Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41414838›Full record

ArticleAnimal bioscience2026

Co-ensiling whole-plant mulberry with navel orange residue enhances fermentation quality, bacterial community, and in vitro digestibility.

Rongqiang Chen, Qiang Zhang, Xiang Ou, Xianhong Cao, Lijuan Wu, Hai Lian, Hualiang Xie, Xianghui Zhao, Xiaowen Lei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal bioscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rongqiang ChenGanzhou Key Laboratory for the Exploration and Utilization of Novel Feed Resources, Ganzhou Animal Husbandry and Fisheries Research Institute, Gannan Academy of Sciences, Ganzhou, China.
Qiang ZhangGanzhou Key Laboratory for the Exploration and Utilization of Novel Feed Resources, Ganzhou Animal Husbandry and Fisheries Research Institute, Gannan Academy of Sciences, Ganzhou, China.
Xiang OuGanzhou Key Laboratory for the Exploration and Utilization of Novel Feed Resources, Ganzhou Animal Husbandry and Fisheries Research Institute, Gannan Academy of Sciences, Ganzhou, China.
Xianhong CaoGanzhou Key Laboratory for the Exploration and Utilization of Novel Feed Resources, Ganzhou Animal Husbandry and Fisheries Research Institute, Gannan Academy of Sciences, Ganzhou, China.
Lijuan WuGanzhou Key Laboratory for the Exploration and Utilization of Novel Feed Resources, Ganzhou Animal Husbandry and Fisheries Research Institute, Gannan Academy of Sciences, Ganzhou, China.
Hai LianGanzhou Key Laboratory for the Exploration and Utilization of Novel Feed Resources, Ganzhou Animal Husbandry and Fisheries Research Institute, Gannan Academy of Sciences, Ganzhou, China.
Hualiang XieGanzhou Key Laboratory for the Exploration and Utilization of Novel Feed Resources, Ganzhou Animal Husbandry and Fisheries Research Institute, Gannan Academy of Sciences, Ganzhou, China.
Xianghui ZhaoJiangxi Province Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition/Engineering Research Center of Feed Development, College of Animal Science and Technology, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, China.
Xiaowen LeiGanzhou Key Laboratory for the Exploration and Utilization of Novel Feed Resources, Ganzhou Animal Husbandry and Fisheries Research Institute, Gannan Academy of Sciences, Ganzhou, China.

Funding

Central Guidance for Local Science and Technology Development Fund Projects 20221ZDF03017Ganzhou Science and Technology Plan Projects 2023PNS27065
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveNavel orange residue (NOR) is considered to improve the silage quality of whole-plant mulberry (WPM) because of its high water-soluble carbohydrate (WSC) content. In order to investigate the mechanism underlying NOR regulated WPM silage quality, the chemical composition, fermentation quality, bacterial community, and in vitro digestibility of WPM and NOR mixed silages were analyzed.

methodsWPM and NOR were mixed at ratios of 10:0 (MCK), 7:3 (M7O3), 5:5 (M5O5), and 3:7 (M3O7) on a dry matter (DM) basis. Samples were collected after 15, 30, and 45 days of ensiling to study their chemical composition, fermentation quality, bacterial community, and in vitro digestibility. The optimal treatment was identified through membership function analysis.

resultsIn comparison with MCK, incorporating 30%-70% NOR ensiled for 15-45 days significantly increased DM, WSC, lactic acid, and acetic acid (AA) contents (p<0.05). At the same time, it resulted in a significant decrease in the levels of crude protein, neutral detergent fiber, acid detergent fiber, pH, and NH3-N (p<0.05). The NOR addition encouraged the beneficial heterofermentative species Lactobacillus pontis, Lactobacillus panis, and Lactobacillus buchneri, whilst preventing unfavorable microorganisms (p<0.05). In addition, in vitro rumen fermentation analysis demonstrated that adding 30%-70% NOR and ensiling for 15-30 days markedly increased in vitro DM digestibility, gas production, total volatile fatty acids, AA, and propionic acid (PA) (p<0.05), along with a significant decrease in the AA/PA ratio (p<0.05). M3O7 ensiled for 15 days and M5O5 ensiled for 30 days achieved high membership function values of 0.839 and 0.732, respectively.

conclusionCo-ensiling WPM with 30%-70% NOR for 15-45 days significantly enhanced fermentation quality, improved bacterial diversity, and increased in vitro digestibility. Overall, the optimal strategies for producing high-quality silage are co-ensiling WPM with either 70% NOR for 15 days or 50% NOR for 30 days.

Indexed as

Bacterial CommunityFermentation QualityIn Vitro DigestibilityMixing RatioNavel Orange ResidueWhole-plant Mulberry

Identifiers

PMID41414838
PMCPMC13175052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.