ReviewCancer research and treatment2026
Redefining HER2 in Breast Cancer: From Conventional Positivity to Low and Ultralow in the New Era of Antibody-Drug Conjugates.
Review in Cancer research and treatment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Redefining breast cancer: therapeutic opportunities in HER2-low and emerging molecular subtypes.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Review
- Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-low metastatic breast cancer, 2018-2023: a retrospective, observational, US cohort study.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2026Observational
- Low Expression of a Circular Transcript of the Apoptosis Regulator GeneBiomedicines · 2026Article
- Mechanisms of Resistance and Synergy: The Role of Tumor Microenvironment in HER2-Low Breast Cancer Therapy.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) has evolved from a poor prognostic factor to one of the most impactful predictive biomarkers in oncology. The introduction of trastuzumab established HER2 as a binary determinant of therapy, with HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) becoming the treatment-guiding diagnostic assay. However, the emergence of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), particularly trastuzumab deruxtecan, has challenged this paradigm by demonstrating activity in tumors with low and even ultralow HER2 expression. This review outlines the evolution of HER2 testing, from its historical discovery and early assay variability to the ADC era, where categories such as HER2-low and HER2-ultralow have emerged. We highlight key challenges: poor reproducibility at the lower end of IHC scoring, instability of HER2 status across timepoints and between primary and metastatic tumors, and no consistent biological distinction between low, ultralow, and null. Efforts to improve reliability-including structured training, high-sensitivity assays, RNA-based methods, and artificial intelligence-assisted pathology-are summarized. Finally, we reconsider the therapeutic implications of ADCs, with the question of whether the benefit parallels HER2 expression or extends into HER2-null disease. HER2 exemplifies how biomarker interpretation evolves with drug development. As new ADCs target additional antigens, pathologists must balance trial-driven categories with biologic reproducibility to ensure diagnostics remain aligned with therapeutic advances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.