Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41414805›Full record

ArticleCancer research and treatment2026

Utilization, Reimbursement, and Barriers to Accessing Sequencing Tests for Cancer Care in the Asia-Pacific Region: KSMO Initiatives to Address Cancer Care Inequity.

Omali Pitiyarachchi, Aaron C Tan, Tawasapon Thambamroong, Rogelio Velasco, Yuji Uehara, Daphne Lee, Hsiang-Fong Kao, Vivek Agarwala, Yueh Ni Lim, Dimas Priantono and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research and treatment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Omali PitiyarachchiSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Aaron C TanDivision of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.
Tawasapon ThambamroongDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Phramongkutklao Hospital and College of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand.
Rogelio VelascoLung Center of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines.
Yuji UeharaDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital, Japan.
Daphne LeeThe Medical City, Manila, Philippines.
Hsiang-Fong KaoDepartment of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Vivek AgarwalaDepartment of Medical Oncology & Hemat Oncology, Narayana Health, Narayana Superspeciality Hospital - Howrah & RN Tagore Hospital - Kolkata, India.
Yueh Ni LimSarawak General Hospital, Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia.
Dimas PriantonoDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Ardhi Rahman AhaniDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Kyaw Zin WinMandalar Hospital, Mandalay, Myanmar.
Young Saing KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.
Changhoon YooAsan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. yooc@amc.seoul.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The Asia-Pacific region is marked by healthcare diversity and economic disparity. Materials and Methods: To understand the utilization and reimbursement practices of next-generation sequencing (NGS) and other sequencing methods relevant to oncology clinical practice in the region, a semi-structured survey was undertaken of respondents from 11 countries represented by the Korean Society of Medical Oncology (KSMO) 2024 Young Oncologist Forum alumni. Results: While 79% of respondents reported access to NGS at their institution, full government reimbursement was uncommon and varied by test type and clinical setting. Japan and South Korea offered the most comprehensive public coverage, including for circulating tumor DNA-based liquid biopsy. Lower- and upper-middle-income countries, such as the Philippines, Indonesia, and India, reported no government reimbursement, thus relying on user-pay methods or private insurance payments. One marked barrier to NGS reimbursement was the prohibitive cost of tests (100%), followed by a limited budget to fund testing (78.6%), and then by policy or regulatory restrictions (50.0%). On a similar note, insurance coverage (92.9%) and patient income (85.7%) were key concerns regarding access and equity to tests. Test reimbursement (or lack thereof) and cost were cited almost universally as the most elevated concerns by the respondents. Conclusion: The findings demonstrated a wide disparity in access, funding and reimbursement of sequencing tests across the region. Addressing cost, improving reimbursement mechanisms, and building infrastructure capacity will be critical for the equitable integration of NGS into routine cancer care in the Asia-Pacific.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesHealth Services AccessibilityHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingNeoplasmsAsiaHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesAsia Pacific regionCancer care inequitiesNext-generation sequencing (NGS)Precision medicineReimbursementSequencing tests

Identifiers

PMID41414805
PMCPMC13680088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.