Lies and LAIs: why accuracy of information is the key to understanding the benefits and the resistance to using long-acting formulation.

The failure to make LAI the default route over the same oral when both are available is a lost opportunity to improve outcomes for people with schizophrenia. A striking example is the lost opportunity to improve life expectancy. A sophisticated pharmacoepidemiologic study from Sweden matched antipsychotic prescriptions with mortality rates and found that receiving an LAI version improved longevity by about 30% compared to its equivalent oral counterpart. Published a decade ago, it seems to have had little impact within US mental health services. This paper attempts to explain some of the reasons for complacency in adapting LAIs as a preferred approach for oral that have an LAI option available. Hypotheses include (1) not appreciating the importance of accurate information to guide present and future treatment recommendations, (2) considering LAIs primarily for adherence interventions rather than their more general benefit as a superior information platform, (3) how fear of disclosing nonadherence is a primary cause of misinformation, and (4) complacency with status quo acceptance of misinformation without fully appreciating how it harms future outcomes. The outcome benefits that come from changing from the oral to the LAI, if available, will continue. Advances in formulation technology have greatly improved the safety and flexibility of recent LAIs compared to earlier formulations, and formulation advances will allow for additional antipsychotics currently limited to oral formulation to expand to having an LAI version readily available.