ArticleWater environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation2025
Negative Impact of Dental Wastewater on the Environment and Human Health: A Scoping Review.
Article in Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Negative Impact of Dental Wastewater on the Environment and Human Health: A Scoping Review.Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to analyze evidence on the physical, chemical, and microbiological risks associated with dental wastewater (DWW) and its impact on the environment and human health. As part of a scoping review, we searched the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for studies that described DWW management, characterization, filtration, and associated risks. The search was limited to studies published in English, including experimental, laboratory, observational studies, and reviews. We extracted the study design, country of origin, sample location, components, objectives, and results. Using VOSviewer software, an analysis of author coauthorship and keyword co-occurrence was conducted. Environmental and human risks were examined, and strategies to minimize damage were discussed. The search initially yielded 1967 articles until June 2024. After removing duplicates and applying exclusion criteria, 29 articles were selected for inclusion. Most studies (55.1%) were experimental, with heavy metals being the most frequently studied pollutants (60%), particularly mercury (Hg). Microbiological analyses appeared in six studies (20.6%), and bisphenol A in two studies (6.9%). The environmental pollutant potential of DWW was reported in 22 studies (75.8%), while only five studies (17.2%) documented risks to humans. In conclusion, DWW poses significant environmental hazards due to its toxic composition and pollutant potential. Although evidence on human health risks is still limited and fragmented, preliminary findings suggest possible concerns that warrant attention. These results highlight the urgent need for more comprehensive studies and support the implementation of regulatory and management strategies to mitigate environmental and potential human health impacts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.