Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41414729›Full record

ArticleThe clinical teacher2026

Enhancing Early Medical Education Through Patient Engagement: Creation of a Toolkit Informed by Experts by Experience.

Jaimy Saif, David Rogers, Claire Stocker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The clinical teacher, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jaimy SaifAston Medical School, College of Health and Life Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6401-0617
David RogersExpert by Experience, Birmingham, UK.
Claire StockerAston Medical School, College of Health and Life Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0178-7349

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Incorporating the patient voice into health professional education enhances empathy, promotes person-centred care and enriches learning. This cocreation article describes the development of a practical, feedback-informed toolkit to support early medical education through expert by experience (EBE) engagement. EBEs from The Silverlining Brain Injury Charity contributed to the design via a qualitative study using open-ended questionnaires. Thematic analysis identified six key themes: the importance of respectful engagement, logistical challenges, clarity of session expectations, recognition of EBE expertise, personal benefits of participation and ethical concerns. EBEs emphasised the need for dignity, structured facilitation, emotional safeguards and flexible delivery methods. The resulting toolkit is mapped directly to these themes. It includes guidance on planning, facilitation, ethical considerations, orientation and evaluation. Designed for Level 3 of the patient engagement spectrum, where EBEs share lived experiences in faculty-facilitated teaching, the toolkit promotes meaningful, sustainable involvement. It responds to growing calls for coproduction in health education and serves as a replicable model for integrating patient insights into curriculum design and delivery. While based on a small, specialised sample, the depth and clarity of EBE feedback offer strong foundations for this resource. Future work should explore its adaptability across different healthcare disciplines and settings. To increase accessibility, the toolkit is available in two formats: as a shareable webpage and a navigable PDF document. This approach enables wider reach and sustained use by educators, ensuring that patient voices remain central to shaping future health professionals.

Indexed as

Education, MedicalPatient ParticipationCurriculumHumansPatient-Centered CareQualitative ResearchSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID41414729
PMCPMC12715381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.