ArticleThe clinical teacher2026
Enhancing Early Medical Education Through Patient Engagement: Creation of a Toolkit Informed by Experts by Experience.
Article in The clinical teacher, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enhancing Early Medical Education Through Patient Engagement: Creation of a Toolkit Informed by Experts by Experience.The clinical teacher · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Incorporating the patient voice into health professional education enhances empathy, promotes person-centred care and enriches learning. This cocreation article describes the development of a practical, feedback-informed toolkit to support early medical education through expert by experience (EBE) engagement. EBEs from The Silverlining Brain Injury Charity contributed to the design via a qualitative study using open-ended questionnaires. Thematic analysis identified six key themes: the importance of respectful engagement, logistical challenges, clarity of session expectations, recognition of EBE expertise, personal benefits of participation and ethical concerns. EBEs emphasised the need for dignity, structured facilitation, emotional safeguards and flexible delivery methods. The resulting toolkit is mapped directly to these themes. It includes guidance on planning, facilitation, ethical considerations, orientation and evaluation. Designed for Level 3 of the patient engagement spectrum, where EBEs share lived experiences in faculty-facilitated teaching, the toolkit promotes meaningful, sustainable involvement. It responds to growing calls for coproduction in health education and serves as a replicable model for integrating patient insights into curriculum design and delivery. While based on a small, specialised sample, the depth and clarity of EBE feedback offer strong foundations for this resource. Future work should explore its adaptability across different healthcare disciplines and settings. To increase accessibility, the toolkit is available in two formats: as a shareable webpage and a navigable PDF document. This approach enables wider reach and sustained use by educators, ensuring that patient voices remain central to shaping future health professionals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.