Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41414722›Full record

ArticleInfection control and hospital epidemiology2026

Risk factors for progression from

Sophia Chang, Nicholas Turner, Michael Yarrington, Deverick Anderson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sophia ChangDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Nicholas TurnerDivision of Infectious Diseases, https://ror.org/00py81415Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0650-4894
Michael YarringtonDivision of Infectious Diseases, https://ror.org/00py81415Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3186-1519
Deverick AndersonDivision of Infectious Diseases, https://ror.org/00py81415Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6882-5496

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify host and clinical risk factors contributing to the development of

designRetrospective, matched case-control study.

settingDuke University Health System, including 3 hospitals and affiliated outpatient clinics.

participantsAdult patients who underwent ≥2 two-step

methodsData collection encompassed a 90-day "pre-exposure" period preceding index testing and a ≤ 90-day "exposure" period between index and repeat testing. Antibiotic use was stratified by risk for each period. Multivariate conditional logistic regression with forward selection was used to identify predictors of progression.

resultsAmong 2,212 colonized patients, 71 cases and 133 matched controls were identified. Several host and clinical characteristics were independently associated with progression to CDI in our multivariate model. Notably, high-risk antibiotic use across the pre-exposure and exposure periods was associated with greater odds of progression to CDI compared to other patterns of antibiotic use (adjusted odds ratio 2.70;

conclusionsSustained exposure to high-risk antibiotics was a strong predictor of the progression from

Indexed as

Clostridioides difficileClostridium InfectionsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ToxinsCase-Control StudiesDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Toxins

Identifiers

PMID41414722
PMCPMC12932920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.