Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41414707›Full record

SynthesisNursing & health sciences2025

A Systematic Review of Staff Perspectives on Safety on Psychiatric Wards.

Oladapo Akinlotan, Maria Dumitriu

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nursing & health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Oladapo AkinlotanSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Medicine & Social Care, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9285-9757
Maria DumitriuSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Medicine & Social Care, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, UK.

Funding

Anglia Ruskin University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients on psychiatric wards encounter harm while receiving care, which leads to millions of fatalities every year. Understanding staff's perspectives on patients' safety on psychiatric wards is crucial for managing safety issues and concerns. This study aims to provide a reliable summary of the current evidence on staff's perspectives regarding safety on psychiatric wards. Studies were identified through systematic searches of six electronic databases. The characteristics of eligible studies were limited to peer-reviewed qualitative research published in the English language within the last 10 years, which explored staff's perspective on patient safety in psychiatric wards. Seventeen studies met all the eligibility criteria. Data synthesis was performed using a thematic analysis approach, and four major themes were identified: perception of safety, safety interventions, therapeutic environment, staff and patients' safety. Patient safety on psychiatric wards is multifaceted, necessitating a balance between protection and autonomy, effective environmental design, compassionate care, and staff well-being. Safety interventions must consider both patients' needs and the emotional and physical demands on staff to create a therapeutic and secure environment.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelPatient SafetyPerceptionPsychiatric Department, HospitalHumansQualitative ResearchSafety Managementpatient safetypsychiatric wardssafetysystematic reviewward safety

Identifiers

PMID41414707
PMCPMC12715384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.