Observational studyCritical care (London, England)2025
Association between red blood cell transfusion and adverse clinical outcomes is Independent of cardiac history: a multicenter observational InPUT study analysis.
Observational study in Critical care (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Current perspectives and updates on transfusion strategies in critically ill anemic patients.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
49 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeRed-blood-cell (RBC) transfusion is one of the most frequent interventions in critical care patients. While patients with acute cardiac conditions are more likely to receive transfusions at higher haemoglobin thresholds than other critically ill patients, data on RBC transfusion practice for critically ill patients with pre-existing cardiac conditions are scarce.
methodsUsing the International Point-Prevalence Study of Intensive-Care Unit Transfusion Practices cohort, weighted logistic regression investigated the association between the RBC units transfused and the primary composite outcome of 28-day mortality, new-onset acute kidney injury or ventilatory weaning failure. Interactions with cardiac history (acute coronary syndrome and/or heart failure) were tested.
resultsCardiac history was present in 746 of 3643 patients (20%) and 894 of 3643 (25%) received at least one RBC unit. Transfusion rates were similar in patients with and without cardiac history (25% vs. 24%; p = 0.51). Among transfused patients, median nadir haemoglobin during ICU stay was slightly higher in those with cardiac history (7.6 g/dL vs. 7.4 g/dL respectively; p = 0.007), whereas stated haemoglobin transfusion threshold did not statistically differ (8.5 g/dL vs. 8.0 g/dL; p = 0.11). Each additional RBC unit increased the odds of the composite outcome in the whole cohort (2.18, 95% CI 1.85–2.56, p < 0.0001), without interaction with cardiac history (p = 0.44).
conclusionsRBC transfusion was commonly and similarly prescribed in critically ill patients with or without cardiac history. Each additional unit was associated with a worse outcome with no evidence of differential effect due to cardiac history.
trial registrationNL9049 (Dutch Trial Register), registered on 16 November 2020.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.