Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41413912›Full record

ArticleTrials2025

Treatment guided by cerebral oximetry in mechanically ventilated newborns: a statistical analysis plan for step one of the SafeBoosC-IIIv randomised clinical trial.

Johanne Juul Petersen, Caroline Barkholt Kamp, Markus Harboe Olsen, Mathias Lühr Hansen, Kristian Thorlund, Adelina Pellicer, Gunnar Naulaers, Eugene Dempsey, Gitte Holst Hahn, Patrick Bjerregaard Andersen and 33 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05907317 (Safeguarding the Brain of Our Smallest Children-IIIv), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05907317 phase3recruitingnot on this map

Safeguarding the Brain of Our Smallest Children-IIIv (SafeBoosC-IIIv): Cerebral Oximetry Versus Usual Care in Mechanically Ventilated Newborns

TypeinterventionalSponsorCopenhagen Trial Unit, Center for Clinical Intervention ResearchRan2025 to 2029Enrolled1,610ConditionsHypoxia, Infant, Newborn, DiseasesArmsCerebral oximetry monitoring device, Usual care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

43 authors.

Johanne Juul PetersenCentre for Clinical Intervention Research, Copenhagen Trial Unit, The Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark. johanne.juul.petersen@ctu.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9837-1958
Caroline Barkholt KampCentre for Clinical Intervention Research, Copenhagen Trial Unit, The Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Markus Harboe OlsenCentre for Clinical Intervention Research, Copenhagen Trial Unit, The Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mathias Lühr HansenCentre for Clinical Intervention Research, Copenhagen Trial Unit, The Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Kristian ThorlundDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Adelina PellicerDepartment of Neonatology, La Paz University Hospital, Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research-IdIPAZ, Madrid, Spain.
Gunnar NaulaersUniversity Hospital Leuven, Louvain, Belgium.
Eugene DempseyInfant Research Centre, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Gitte Holst HahnDepartment of Neonatology, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Patrick Bjerregaard AndersenCentre for Clinical Intervention Research, Copenhagen Trial Unit, The Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Marie Isabel Skov RasmussenDepartment of Neonatology, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Gerhard PichlerDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescence Medicine, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria.
Gabriel DimitriouUniversity of Patras, General Hospital, Rio, Greece.
Tomasz SzczapaII Department of Neonatology, Neonatal Biophysical Monitoring and Cardiopulmonary Therapies Research Unit, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Maria Livia OgneanFaculty of Medicine, Lucian Blaga University Sibiu, Sibiu, Romania.
Saudamini NesargiSt John's Medical College Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Gabriel MusanteHospital Universitario Austral, Pilar, Argentina.
Lina ChalakUT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA.
Massimo Di MaioCHU Nîmes, Nîmes, France.
Jyoti LakhwaniWomen and Newborn Hospital, University Teaching Hospitals, Lusaka, Zambia.
Renato S ProcianoyHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal Do Rio Grande Do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Jakub TkaczykUniversity Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic.
Hans FuchsMedical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Merih CetinkayaDepartment of Neonatology, Health Sciences University, Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Cornelia HagmannDepartment of Neonatology and Intensive Care, University Children's Hospital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Himanshu PopatGrace Centre for Newborn Intensive Care in The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia.
Jorge FabresDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Laishuan WangNational Health Commission Key Laboratory of Neonatal Diseases, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Georg SchmölzerDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Salvador Piris-BorregasHospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Ramona MohoraThe National Institute for Mother and Child Care Alessandrescu-Rusescu, Polizu Maternity, București, Romania.
Pamela ZafraHospital Universitario Puerta del Mar, Cádiz, Spain.
Kosmas SarafidisIppokrateion General Hospital of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Miguel Alsina-CasanovaDepartment of Neonatology, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, BCNatal-Barcelona Center for Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, Barcelona, Spain.
Nariae Baik-SchneditzDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescence Medicine, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria.
Laura Serrano LopezHospital Universitario Virgen Las Nieves, Granada, Spain.
Elke GriesmaierDepartment of Pediatrics II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Eleftheria HatzidakiUniversity Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Greece.
A ShashidharSt John's Medical College Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Theodore DassiosUniversity of Patras, General Hospital, Rio, Greece.
Luis ArruzaHospital Clinico San Carlos-IdISSC, Madrid, Spain.
Gorm GreisenDepartment of Neonatology, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Janus Christian JakobsenCentre for Clinical Intervention Research, Copenhagen Trial Unit, The Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond 3165-00094B
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNewborns requiring invasive mechanical ventilation are at high risk of neurodevelopmental impairment, prolonged hospitalisation, and increased mortality. Treatment guided by cerebral oximetry monitoring has been proposed to reduce morbidity and mortality.

methodsThe SafeBoosC-IIIv trial is a multicentre, parallel-group, randomised clinical trial. The trial will be conducted in two steps. This is a statistical analysis plan for step one. The objective of step one is to assess whether treatment guided by cerebral oximetry monitoring, compared with usual care, increases the number of hospital-free days in newborns receiving invasive mechanical ventilation. Inclusion criteria are gestational age ≥ 28 + 0 weeks, postnatal age less than 28 days, expected to receive invasive mechanical ventilation (intubation) for at least 24 h, and a cerebral oximeter available so monitoring can be started within 6 h after initiation of invasive mechanical ventilation. Exclusion criteria are suspicion of or confirmed brain injury or congenital heart malformation likely to require surgery. A total of 1610 participants will be randomised 1:1 to treatment guided by cerebral oximetry monitoring or usual care. The primary outcome will be hospital-free days within 90 days of randomisation, which will be analysed with the van Elteren test stratified by 'centre'. This statistical analysis plan provides a detailed description of the planned analyses, including methods for handling missing data and assessing statistical assumptions. Analyses will follow the intention-to-treat principle and will be performed independently by two statisticians.

conclusionThis statistical analysis plan describes the planned statistical analyses in detail for step one of the SafeBoosC-IIIv trial.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05907317. First submitted on 8 June 2023, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05907317 .

Indexed as

Cerebrovascular CirculationOximetryRespiration, ArtificialData Interpretation, StatisticalGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornMulticenter Studies as TopicPredictive Value of TestsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeCerebral oximetry monitoringMechanical ventilationNeonatologyRandomised clinical trialStatistics

Identifiers

PMID41413912
PMCPMC12821886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.