ArticleHealth policy and planning2026
Power, interests, and maternal health care: a political economy analysis of service delivery redesign in Kenya.
Article in Health policy and planning, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The relationship between prolonged travel and mortality among women with complicated deliveries in rural Kenya.Journal of global health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The maternal and newborn health (MNH) service delivery redesign (SDR) in Kakamega County, Kenya, represents the country's first system-level reorganization of MNH services. The reform aimed to improve care quality and reduce mortality by centralizing delivery services at designated hubs. Using a political economy lens, we examined how ideology, political dynamics, and institutional structures shaped the agenda-setting, adoption, implementation, and sustainability of SDR. We drew on data from document reviews, stakeholder analysis, semi-structured interviews, and non-participant observation to assess the structural, contextual, and institutional factors influencing the reform. Ambiguity around SDR's purpose contributed to the community's uncertain engagement characterized by neither full endorsement nor resistance, highlighting the need for clearer communication and participation to build ownership. The interaction between formal institutions (county health governance and partnership frameworks) and informal norms (trust, shared interpretation, and relational coordination) created early momentum for implementation, particularly among health system actors. However, limited financial capacity and unclear alignment with national policy priorities undermined progress and long-term viability. Kakamega's experience demonstrates how political incentives, devolved autonomy, and local institutional context jointly shape reform outcomes. Achieving successful implementation of system-level reforms requires integrating local political leadership, strengthening community engagement, aligning with evolving national policies, and securing predictable financing. This study provides practical lessons for future MNH and system-level reforms in Kenya and similar decentralized, resource-constrained settings. Lessons include the importance of balancing formal and informal institutions to ensure both political feasibility and enduring impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.