ArticleBMC oral health2025
Deep learning-based fractured tooth detection in occlusal radiographs.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study highlights the importance of accurate and quick diagnosis of detection, and classification of fractured teeth and the potential benefits of applying deep learning (DL) techniques to solve this problem.
methodsIn the study, occlusal radiography (OR) of the premaxilla is used for tooth fracture detection of teeth 11 and 21. For that, a dataset that contains 200 ORs of various tooth conditions was constructed. In the proposed method, teeth 11 and 21 are automatically detected in OR images using a YOLOv9-based machine learning framework as the first step. Then, images of these two teeth are obtained by cropping OR images using the bounding box coordinates of teeth 11 and 21, obtained by a YOLO-based detector. Finally, these cropped images are provided as input to a pre-trained CNN-based network to classify between the "fracture" or "non-fractured tooth". For this purpose, VGG19, EfficientNetB0, InceptionResNetV2, and InceptionV3 nets are employed, and the obtained classification results are fused by applying a majority voting step to further improve the performance.
resultsThe experimental studies obtained a 99.5% mean average precision (mAP50) score and 85.6% for mAP50-95. On the other hand, percent accuracy rates in the range from 84.67% to 87.94% were observed using five pre-trained networks, and the percent accuracy metric was improved to 91.94% using the majority voting-based fusion approach.
conclusionThe findings indicate that the proposed method effectively detects fractured teeth by leveraging machine learning techniques. Furthermore, this approach provides a pioneering framework for integrating artificial intelligence (AI) methodologies into dental diagnostics, offering clinicians a reliable decision-support tool for improved diagnostic accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.