Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41413849›Full record

ReviewCardiovascular diabetology. Endocrinology reports2025

Aging, biofilms, and diabetic foot ulcers: disrupting chronic infections with super-oxidized solutions and addressing age-related vulnerabilities.

Nor Afifah Supardy, Rejith R S Kumar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiovascular diabetology. Endocrinology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nor Afifah SupardyFaculty of Medicine, Unit of Microbiology, AIMST University, Bedong, Malaysia. norafifah@aimst.edu.my.
Rejith R S KumarFaculty of Medicine, Unit of Microbiology, AIMST University, Bedong, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetic Foot Ulcers (DFUs) are a serious complication of diabetes, often leading to chronic infections, prolonged hospitalization, and, in severe cases, amputations. A major challenge in DFU treatment is the presence of polymicrobial biofilms, complex bacterial communities encased in a protective extracellular matrix, which enhances their survival, evade immune responses, and contributes to antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Conventional treatments, such as systemic antibiotics, antiseptics, and mechanical debridement, often fail to fully eliminate biofilms, highlighting the need for more effective therapeutic strategies. Considering the existing ineffective anti-biofilm treatments, super-oxidized solution (SOS) has emerged as a promising non-antibiotic alternative for DFU infections. As a reactive oxygen species (ROS)-based therapy, SOS effectively disrupts biofilm integrity, enhances bacterial eradication, and promotes wound healing by reducing inflammation and supporting tissue regeneration. Additionally, its mechanism of action could significantly minimize the risk of AMR, making it a valuable adjunct to conventional therapies. The purpose of this review is to explore the mechanisms of biofilm formation in DFUs, evaluate the limitations of current treatment approaches, and highlight the therapeutic potential of SOS. Integrating SOS into DFU treatment protocols could improve infection control, reduce chronic wound burden, and enhance patient outcomes. By advancing non-antibiotic solutions like SOS, DFU management can shift toward more effective and sustainable wound care strategies, ultimately reducing the need for surgical interventions and improving the quality of life for diabetic patients.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial resistanceBiofilmsDiabetic foot ulcersSuper-oxidized solutionWound healing

Identifiers

PMID41413849
PMCPMC12715951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.