ReviewCardiovascular diabetology. Endocrinology reports2025
Aging, biofilms, and diabetic foot ulcers: disrupting chronic infections with super-oxidized solutions and addressing age-related vulnerabilities.
Review in Cardiovascular diabetology. Endocrinology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Regenerative Microbiology: Harnessing Bacterial Antagonism and Spatiotemporal Signaling for Diabetic Wound Repair.Smart medicine · 2026Review
- Multi-omics integration identifies macrophage senescence driven by the RUNX1-P53 axis as a key mechanism in diabetic foot ulcer.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Article
- A Comprehensive Review of Antimicrobial Peptides and Smart Biomaterials in Chronic Wound Therapy: Overcoming Biofilms, Resistance, and Translational Barriers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetic Foot Ulcers (DFUs) are a serious complication of diabetes, often leading to chronic infections, prolonged hospitalization, and, in severe cases, amputations. A major challenge in DFU treatment is the presence of polymicrobial biofilms, complex bacterial communities encased in a protective extracellular matrix, which enhances their survival, evade immune responses, and contributes to antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Conventional treatments, such as systemic antibiotics, antiseptics, and mechanical debridement, often fail to fully eliminate biofilms, highlighting the need for more effective therapeutic strategies. Considering the existing ineffective anti-biofilm treatments, super-oxidized solution (SOS) has emerged as a promising non-antibiotic alternative for DFU infections. As a reactive oxygen species (ROS)-based therapy, SOS effectively disrupts biofilm integrity, enhances bacterial eradication, and promotes wound healing by reducing inflammation and supporting tissue regeneration. Additionally, its mechanism of action could significantly minimize the risk of AMR, making it a valuable adjunct to conventional therapies. The purpose of this review is to explore the mechanisms of biofilm formation in DFUs, evaluate the limitations of current treatment approaches, and highlight the therapeutic potential of SOS. Integrating SOS into DFU treatment protocols could improve infection control, reduce chronic wound burden, and enhance patient outcomes. By advancing non-antibiotic solutions like SOS, DFU management can shift toward more effective and sustainable wound care strategies, ultimately reducing the need for surgical interventions and improving the quality of life for diabetic patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.