ArticleBMC research notes2025
Lived experiences of peer learning to improve the professional capabilities of hospital managers: a phenomenological study.
Article in BMC research notes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study explored hospital managers' lived experiences with peer learning as a constructivist educational approach in healthcare management. It aimed to elucidate how peer learning contributes to managerial development and to identify contextual factors that either facilitate or hinder its effectiveness in healthcare organizations. RESULTS DESCRIPTION: Peer learning significantly improved decision-making, managerial performance, inter-organizational interactions, and continuous updating of specialized knowledge. Exchanging real-world experiences enhanced critical thinking, professional attitudes, and self-efficacy among managers. Facilitating factors included strong organizational support, sharing successful practices, and benchmarking against high-performing hospitals. However, effectiveness was limited by weak teamwork culture, the absence of systematic management development strategies, restricted structured interactions, and organizational/structural barriers. Additional obstacles included limited managerial authority, deficiencies in succession planning, and inadequate coordination of directors' assemblies by upstream institutions. Overall, peer learning proved highly valuable for developing managerial competencies, yet realizing its full potential requires eliminating structural obstacles and implementing targeted participatory policies and mechanisms (e.g., learning communities and succession planning programs).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.