Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41413831›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2025

Composite shock indices with age, GCS, and SpO2 for trauma triage outcomes: a retrospective cohort study.

Mehdi Torabi, Abolfazl Bagheri, Neda Naeemi Bafghi, Moghaddameh Mirzaee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mehdi TorabiKerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran. mtorabi1390@yahoo.com.
Abolfazl BagheriKerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Neda Naeemi BafghiKerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Moghaddameh MirzaeeKerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe study evaluates the effectiveness of composite indices, incorporating age, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), and oxygen saturation (SpO2) into shock indices, in predicting severe trauma patient outcomes in the emergency department (ED).

methodThe study was a retrospective, single-center, and cohort-based analysis of adult trauma patients (aged > 18 years) triaged as emergency severity index (ESI) levels 1 or 2 at a level 2 trauma center, conducted over 6 months. Data were collected encompassing vital signs, and composite shock indices from the shock index (SI), reverse shock index (rSI), and modified shock index (MSI) in combination with age, GCS and Spo2.

resultsA study of 437 participants revealed that composite triad-based shock indices such as rSI × SpO2 × GCS/Age, and Age SI/(SpO2 × GCS) significantly influence the differentiation of triage levels 1 and 2. The Age SI/ (SpO2 × GCS) predict in-hospital mortality, while Age MSI/ (SpO2 × GCS), predict blood transfusion necessity. The AUC for triage level discrimination was 1.00 (sensitivity 100%, specificity 100%), for in-hospital mortality 0.77 (sensitivity 69.3%, specificity 80.5%), and for blood transfusion need 0.75 (sensitivity 68.9%, specificity 70.6%).

conclusionSI, MSI, and rSI, when combined with age, GCS, and SpO2, are significant predictors of triage level discrimination, in-hospital mortality, and need for blood transfusion, suggesting that composite shock indices are more beneficial than indices alone.

Indexed as

Glasgow Coma ScaleOxygen SaturationShockTriageWounds and InjuriesAdultAgedAge FactorsEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHospital MortalityHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesBlood transfusionIn-hospital mortalityTraumaTriageVital signs

Identifiers

PMID41413831
PMCPMC12822123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.