ArticleJournal of translational medicine2025
Predicting host tropism in influenza a viruses: insights from multi-segment nucleotide signatures.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInfluenza A virus (IAV) poses a significant public health threat due to its cross-species transmission and complex host adaptation mechanisms. This study integrated whole-genome data from avian, human, swine, and bovine IAV strains, using machine learning to predict viral host tropism based on nucleotide site features and to identify key sites driving host adaptation along with their synergistic effects.
methodsA total of 64,000 IAV sequences from avian, human, swine, and bovine hosts were analyzed to build host-prediction models. A four-class classification framework (avian, human, swine, bovine) was constructed using nucleotide site features from all eight genomic segments (PB2, PB1, PA, HA, NP, NA, MP, NS). Eight machine learning algorithms (logistic regression, decision tree, random forest, SVM, KNN, gradient boosting, XGBoost, LightGBM) were benchmarked via 10-fold stratified cross-validation. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, AUPRC, and AUC. SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analysis prioritized critical nucleotide sites, while bivariate association tests identified synergistic/antagonistic interactions between sites. Nucleotide composition profiles were compared across host groups using hierarchical clustering and heatmap visualization.
resultsThe XGBoost algorithm demonstrated the best and most stable performance, achieving an AUC value of over 0.95 in distinguishing human-derived sequences from non-human ones. SHAP analysis identified the top 20 critical nucleotide sites for each gene segment, such as sites 46 and 698 in the NS segment. Nucleotide composition analysis revealed high similarity between human and swine sequences in the HA and PB2 segments, and between avian and bovine sequences. The HA segment was particularly challenging in differentiating human from swine strains. Bivariate site association analysis uncovered significant synergistic or antagonistic effects between key sites within gene segments, forming complex networks. For instance, in the NS segment, a positive prediction contribution was observed when sites 371, 698, and 419 were all G.
conclusionsThis study advances our mechanistic understanding of IAV host adaptation, identifies molecular determinants for zoonotic risk stratification, and establishes a scalable machine learning framework for predicting viral host tropism through nucleotide signature analysis, thereby enhancing surveillance strategies and informing preventive measures against emerging viral threats.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.