ArticleBMC proceedings2025
Maximizing opportunities for success as an early career STEM faculty: a growth mindset approach.
Article in BMC proceedings, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Academics are familiar with the concept of a growth mindset, a framework teachers use to help students embrace challenges, overcome obstacles, and learn from their mistakes. In this context, we argue that the principles of this paradigm are equally applicable in promoting the career advancement of early STEM academics, as well as those in non-STEM fields where successful career progression requires demonstrating contributions to scholarship, teaching, and service, often involving collaborative work. The early years of a faculty career offer numerous opportunities for growth, but these may be missed or seen as obstacles if approached with a fixed mindset. This is especially true for individuals with intersectional identities who may lack role models or feel out of place in an unsupportive academic environment. We argue that a well-planned, purposeful, and balanced approach to workload responsibilities that aligns with institutional culture and priorities can lead to outstanding performance and career advancement, enabling individuals to achieve their aspirations and personal goals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.