ArticleBMC nursing2025
Validity and measurement invariance of the cognitive and affective mindfulness scale-revised (CAMS-R) among nursing postgraduates, nursing interns, and registered nurses.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis present study aimed to evaluate the reliability, validity, and measurement invariance of the Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised (CAMS-R) among nursing postgraduates, nursing interns, and registered nurses.
methodA sample of 165 nursing postgraduates, 394 nursing interns, and 540 registered nurses completed the survey, using CAMS-R, Workplace Well-Being Scale (WWB), Occupational Disidentification Scale (QDS), Stigma Consciousness Questionnaire (SCQ) and Intent to Leave Scale (ILS). The collected data were used for item analysis, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), correlation analysis, and measurement invariance testing and Cronbach's α and McDonald's ω coefficients were calculated.
resultsThe Chinese version of the CAMS-R consisted of 10 items across three dimensions: acceptance, attention, and awareness. CFA results indicated that the fit indices of the bi-factor model were superior to those of other models. Additionally, the Cronbach's α and McDonald's ω coefficients of the overall CAMS-R scale and each dimension ranged from 0.73 to 0.84. Results of criterion validity testing showed that CAMS-R was significantly positively correlated with WWB and significantly negatively correlated with QDS, SCQ, and ILS. Meanwhile, the measurement invariance of CAMS-R in nursing postgraduates, nursing interns, and registered nurses was not established.
conclusionsThe Chinese version of the CAMS-R is a reliable and effective tool for assessing mindfulness among nursing postgraduates, nursing interns, and registered nurses; however, potential group differences should be interpreted with cautious clarification. The results of this study suggest that nursing educators can use the CAMS-R to examine the relationship between mindfulness and nurses' occupational behavior and well-being, and evaluate the intervention effects of mindfulness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.