Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41413812›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025

Explainable AI models for identifying anxiety and distress in cardiac patients with ICDs.

Ali Ebrahimi, Jakob Bo Reinevald Eriksen, David Krogh Kølbæk, Jonas Mohr Pedersen, Ebbe Vincent Just Christensen, Søren Skovbakke, Ole Skov, Susanne Schmidt Pedersen, Amir Sorayaie Azar, Uffe Kock Wiil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ali EbrahimiSDU Health Informatics and Technology, The Maersk Mc-Kinney Moller Institute, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. aleb@mmmi.sdu.dk.
Jakob Bo Reinevald EriksenSDU Health Informatics and Technology, The Maersk Mc-Kinney Moller Institute, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
David Krogh KølbækSDU Health Informatics and Technology, The Maersk Mc-Kinney Moller Institute, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Jonas Mohr PedersenSDU Health Informatics and Technology, The Maersk Mc-Kinney Moller Institute, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Ebbe Vincent Just ChristensenSDU Health Informatics and Technology, The Maersk Mc-Kinney Moller Institute, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Søren SkovbakkeDepartment of Psychology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Ole SkovDepartment of Psychology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Susanne Schmidt PedersenDepartment of Psychology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Amir Sorayaie AzarSDU Health Informatics and Technology, The Maersk Mc-Kinney Moller Institute, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Uffe Kock WiilSDU Health Informatics and Technology, The Maersk Mc-Kinney Moller Institute, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiac patients with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators (ICDs) are at elevated risk of experiencing anxiety, depression, or general psychological distress. Nevertheless, routine psychological screening in cardiology care is limited, and early identification of vulnerable individuals remains a challenge, particularly in settings transitioning to remote monitoring. Scalable, data-driven tools are urgently needed to support timely detection and intervention.

methodsWe developed Machine Learning (ML) models to predict anxiety and psychological distress using patient-reported outcomes from the ACQUIRE-ICD dataset (N = 478). The methodology included imputing values, selecting features strategically, and tuning hyperparameters. Nine ML algorithms and two ensemble approaches (stacking and voting) were evaluated. The best-performing models were interpreted using SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) to enhance clinical transparency.

resultsThe stacking classifier achieved an F1-macro score of 0.93 for anxiety detection, while the light gradient boosting machine reached 0.93 for distress prediction. Feature importance analyses revealed that Mental Health Scores (MCS), loneliness scores, depression and anxiety scales, and quality-of-life indices were the most predictive features. Balancing methods such as SMOTE-ENN did not improve model performance and were excluded from final configurations.

conclusionOur findings demonstrate that combining clinical insight, structured preprocessing, and ensemble learning leads to highly accurate and explainable models for detecting psychological distress in ICDs patients. The integration of SHAP enables interpretability and supports clinical trust, paving the way for scalable decision-support tools in cardiology. Future work should explore external validation and real-world deployment. CLINICAL TRIAL: Not applicable

Indexed as

AnxietyDefibrillators, ImplantableMachine LearningPsychological DistressStress, PsychologicalAgedBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsClassification AlgorithmsDepressionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Learning ModelsAnxietyEnsemble modelExplainable AIICDMachine learningPatient-reported outcomesPsychological distressSHAP

Identifiers

PMID41413812
PMCPMC12829265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.