ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
Explainable AI models for identifying anxiety and distress in cardiac patients with ICDs.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond classification metrics: a psychometric-aware benchmark for data augmentation in imbalanced student mental health surveys.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCardiac patients with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators (ICDs) are at elevated risk of experiencing anxiety, depression, or general psychological distress. Nevertheless, routine psychological screening in cardiology care is limited, and early identification of vulnerable individuals remains a challenge, particularly in settings transitioning to remote monitoring. Scalable, data-driven tools are urgently needed to support timely detection and intervention.
methodsWe developed Machine Learning (ML) models to predict anxiety and psychological distress using patient-reported outcomes from the ACQUIRE-ICD dataset (N = 478). The methodology included imputing values, selecting features strategically, and tuning hyperparameters. Nine ML algorithms and two ensemble approaches (stacking and voting) were evaluated. The best-performing models were interpreted using SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) to enhance clinical transparency.
resultsThe stacking classifier achieved an F1-macro score of 0.93 for anxiety detection, while the light gradient boosting machine reached 0.93 for distress prediction. Feature importance analyses revealed that Mental Health Scores (MCS), loneliness scores, depression and anxiety scales, and quality-of-life indices were the most predictive features. Balancing methods such as SMOTE-ENN did not improve model performance and were excluded from final configurations.
conclusionOur findings demonstrate that combining clinical insight, structured preprocessing, and ensemble learning leads to highly accurate and explainable models for detecting psychological distress in ICDs patients. The integration of SHAP enables interpretability and supports clinical trust, paving the way for scalable decision-support tools in cardiology. Future work should explore external validation and real-world deployment. CLINICAL TRIAL: Not applicable
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.