ArticleBMC cancer2025
Treatment outcomes and prognostic factors in children diagnosed with acute myeloid leukaemia in Uganda.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTreatment of paediatric acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) is challenging in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) due to resource constraints with subsequent poorer outcome. This study evaluated treatment outcomes and the determinants of survival in paediatric AML patients in Uganda.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study reviewed data from children with AML treated at three centres in Uganda between January 2016 and December 2022. Treatment comprised induction with daunorubicin and cytarabine and consolidation with high-dose cytarabine. Patients with acute promyelocytic leukaemia were treated on protocols adapted from Children's Oncology Group AAML 1331. All patients received supportive care. The data were analysed using SPSS Version 20.
resultsOne-hundred and fifty-nine children with AML were included with a median age at diagnosis of 9.0 years (IQR: 3.0-12.0). Of the 149 patients who initiated therapy, 69 (46.3%) achieved complete remission after the first induction therapy (CR1), and 81 (54.4%) achieved complete remission (CR) overall. Treatment-related mortality occurred in 50 (31.4%) of the patients, with an early death rate of 27.7% (n = 44). Among the 81 patients who achieved CR, 37 (45.7%) relapsed, of whom 27 (73.0%) subsequently died. The one-, three-, and five-year OS were 39.0%, 25.1%, and 16.7%, respectively. The corresponding EFS were 37.0%, 22.9%, and 15.2%, respectively. Median OS and EFS were 7.4 months (95% CI: 4.3-10.6) and 6.9 months (95% CI: 4.4-9.6), respectively. Factors significantly associated with poor OS included poor nutritional status (p = 0.026), delayed neutrophil recovery following induction (p = 0.030), failure to achieve CR1 (p = 0.031), and failure to complete treatment (p < 0.001).
conclusionsSurvival rates among children with AML in this study were low. Several clinical and biological prognostic factors influenced survival outcomes in this resource-limited setting. Improving outcomes will require improving supportive care or adopting resource-adapted treatment protocols that address the supportive care challenges in such a resource-limited setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.