ArticleBMC microbiology2025
Comparison of the biological activity of different probiotic strains under aerobic and anaerobic conditions.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are widely recognized as probiotics due to their health-promoting properties. Some strains can perform both aerobic metabolism and fermentation, which may influence their biological functions. This study investigated the impact of Lactobacilli metabolism on three specific biological functions: anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and antimicrobial effects, across eleven LAB strains. To this end, growth profiles under aerobic and anaerobic condition were monitored by turbidity. Antimicrobial potential of the probiotic strains was assessed against Staphylococcus aureus and Listeria monocytogenes using extracellular or intracellular fractions of each probiotic previously cultured aerobically or anaerobically. Antioxidant capacity was measured indirectly through a colorimetric assay of iron II. Then anti-inflammatory potential was evaluated in HT29 cells by cytokine quantification. For the first time, this article highlights that all strains studied enhanced their biological activity through fermentative metabolism. As expected, most strains inhibited L. monocytogenes. Among them, Lactobacillus delbruekii subsp. lactis showed the highest biological activity, followed by Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus and Limosilactobacillus mucosae. These strains also reduced inflammation by 50% and exhibited a high antioxidant capacity (585 ± 68 µmol/L). These results demonstrate interesting characteristics of probiotic strains, particularly under fermentative conditions. Their integration into probiotic formulation may provide valuable nutritional strategies to improve gut health and overall well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.