ArticleScientific reports2025
A bimodal longitudinal investigation on changes in sentiments over social media interactions owing to COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A bimodal longitudinal investigation on changes in sentiments over social media interactions owing to COVID-19 pandemic.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The shift in human sentiments across cyberspace during a pandemic was unprecedented before COVID-19, as no prior pandemic had occurred alongside an interactive online environment. In response, we conducted a comprehensive bimodal longitudinal analysis of sentiment trends throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, utilizing a dataset from 569 Twitter users over 724 days spanning from 2019 to 2020. Our study involved examining 56,789 Tweets, focusing on sentiment shifts in both textual content and images. We further investigated existing sentiment classifier libraries and their potential integration to develop a novel classification technique aimed at enhancing sentiment analysis in text-based Tweets. Additionally, we carried out exploratory data analysis on the collected sentiments and images to identify patterns of sentiment changes attributed to the COVID-19 outbreak as expressed on social media. Our findings indicate a 10.55% increase in negative text sentiment and a 24.52% decrease in positive image sentiment during the pandemic. The bimodal investigation reveals a correlation between text and image sentiment expression, highlighting changes over the two years covering both pre-pandemic and pandemic phases, and identifying change-points for each sentiment type during different phases. This study introduces a novel framework for bimodal sentiment analysis and offers valuable insights for policymakers and social scientists in evaluating public sentiment during global crises.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.