ArticleScientific reports2025
Evaluation of compartmentalization systems to study microbial interactions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With some exceptions, wine fermentation has increasingly relied on the use of Saccharomyces cerevisiae starters since the last decades of the past century. However, there is growing interest on the understanding of spontaneous wine fermentation, as well as on the use of complementary non-Saccharomyces wine starters. This in turn raises the question of the importance of interspecific interactions in winemaking and the underlying mechanisms. An important question about these interspecies recognition mechanisms is whether or not it is mediated by physical contact between yeast cells. To address this topic, different laboratories have developed diverse devices to cultivate at least two yeast species in the same growth medium without cell-to-cell contact between them. In this work, we compared four of the most popular systems and found that one of them (twin-bottles exchange through a flat membrane) showed very limited metabolite exchange. Among the other systems (Transwell, dialysis tube, or active exchange through hollow fiber cross-flow filtration devices), each one showed specific characteristics that made them more or less suitable, depending on the objectives of each experiment. The option showing the best versatility and efficiency was the use of active exchange. Our results highlight the importance of carefully characterizing the compartmentalization system when drawing conclusions about the impact of cell-to-cell contact in fermentation experiments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.