ArticleJournal of applied genetics2025
Clinicopathological and genomic profiling in undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma: Small series, clear message.
Article in Journal of applied genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03651374, which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Next-Generation Sequencing in Translational Sarcoma Research: Biological Insights and Emerging Directions.Current oncology reports · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) is a diagnosis of exclusion; given limited effective treatments and marked heterogeneity, there is a need to identify therapeutic targets, a task facilitated by next-generation sequencing (NGS) in clinical practice. We report 2 STS pts with the diagnosis of UPS, G3 - each treated in a clinical trial (NCT03651374) with UNRESARC protocol consisting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CHT), radiotherapy, and surgical resection. Biopsy samples from each patient were subjected to NGS with the TruSight™ Oncology 500 assay (Illumina) and analysed in PierianDX (commercial software). 5 pathogenic alterations were identified: Case A: CCNE1 (6 copies) and MYC (3 copies) amplifications; Case B: CCND1 (3 copies), EGFR (3 copies) and FGFR1 (4 copies) amplifications. Amplifications of cell-cycle associated (CCNE1, CCND1) and apoptosis-related (MYC) genes contribute to uncontrolled proliferation and resistance to apoptosis, while amplifications in receptor tyrosine kinases (EGFR and FGFR1) activate pathways (RAS/MAPK and PI3K/AKT), involved in tumour growth and metastasis. In both patients, a poor pathological response, early local recurrence (LRFS of 9 months in both patients) and progressive disease (PD) when treated with first-line palliative CHT (PFS of 5 months in A and 4 months in B) were noted. All tumours demonstrated a low tumour mutation burden (TMB) (1.6-3.9 mut/Mb) and no microsatellite instability (MSI), explaining no sensitivity to immune checkpoint inhibitors. NGS assays may enable accurate diagnosis and identify predictive biomarkers and novel therapeutic targets - of particular importance in poor-prognosis entities such as UPS. Our report is consistent with the literature classifying UPS as malignancy with a high frequency of CNAs and low TBM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41413689What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.