ReviewPediatric research2026
A reduction in large animal research threatens the perinatal translation research pipeline.
Review in Pediatric research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Brain sparing in fetal growth restriction: The double-edged sword of fetal hypoxaemia.The Journal of physiology · 2026Review
- Prominent astrocytic GLAST pathology occurs in newborn human and piglet hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy: modeling relationships among laminar neuropathology, seizures, and therapeutic hypothermia.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
More than 1 in 10 babies are compromised by preterm birth, low birthweight, maternal pregnancy complications or perinatal hypoxia-ischemia, leading to death or lifelong disability. Advancements in pregnancy and newborn care to date have been underpinned by mechanistic and physiological insights from fundamental discovery science. However, there are growing challenges to the perinatal research pipeline that threaten the next breakthroughs. Reduced funding, discipline-specific publishing, and high attrition are reducing pipeline research capacity and particularly large animal research; over the last two decades there has been a 12.6% decrease in the number of institutes that conduct large animal perinatal studies. Furthermore, paradoxically, over-prioritisation of translational research has come at the expense of discovery science. The complexity of fetal and newborn physiology, transition at birth, pathophysiology, multi-hit and multi-organ insults, and the progressive nature of development and injury, mean that the fetus and newborn are unique study subjects. The fetus and newborn are not small adults. Consequently, progression to clinical trials must acknowledge all available evidence provided through preclinical and clinical discoveries prior to adopting new interventions. The next critical innovations towards a healthy start to life need a thriving perinatal research pipeline that values and prioritises discovery evidence. IMPACT: Ensuring a healthy start to life for all infants needs new discoveries. But there are growing challenges to the perinatal research pipeline that threaten the next advances. Poor funding, competitive publishing, and high attrition are reducing discovery research capacity and reducing large animal research. The unique physiology and ongoing organ development in the fetus and neonate means that they are not small adults, and we must support the perinatal research pipeline to accumulate gold-standard evidence that will inform the next successful advances for better newborn health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.