ArticleScientific reports2025
Impact of 85 kHz versus 125 kHz SHIFT OCTA scan speeds on image quality in retinal diseases and diagnostic reliability of choroidal neovascular membranes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Noninterchangeability of Vessel Density Measurements Across Next-Generation SS-OCTA Systems.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The purpose of the study was to compare Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography (OCTA) scan speeds of 85 kHz and 125 kHz with respect to image quality, diagnostic reliability, and scan time in patients with retinal diseases. In this prospective cohort study, OCTA images were obtained at both scan speeds in 70 eyes from 40 patients with retinal diseases. Masked expert graders evaluated qualitative parameters including clinical utility, artifacts, and overall image quality. Quantitative parameters including scan time, Heidelberg Q-score, and OCTA-Q score were recorded. In 46 eyes with visible choroidal neovascular membrane in the avascular layer of OCTA, AngioTool (Image J) was used to assess vessel percentage area, vessel junction density, average vessel length, and E-Lacunarity. Acquisition speed of 125 kHz OCTA was significantly faster than that of 85 kHz. There were no statistically significant differences in AngioTool parameters between the two protocols. 125 kHz was significantly better than 85 kHz for image quality with fewer noise artefacts and vessel projection artefacts. In conclusion, 125 kHz SHIFT OCTA offers comparable to better image quality to the 85 kHz OCTA with significantly faster acquisition, potentially improving clinical workflow without compromising diagnostic reliability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.