ArticleScientific reports2025
Efficient multi-finger vein recognition using layer-wise progressive MobileNet fine-tuning and a Dense-Head Probabilistic Siamese Network.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Finger-vein recognition offers a highly secure and non-intrusive biometric modality ideal for modern authentication systems, yet its deployment on resource-limited devices remains challenging due to the high computational cost of deep models and the rigidity of single-finger enrollment. We present a new two-stage deep learning framework that solves these problems by combining a lightweight MobileNet feature extractor that gets better over time with a new Dense-Head Probabilistic Siamese (DHPS) matcher. Our method is the only one that allows for multi-finger recognition, so users can authenticate with any finger without losing accuracy or speed. Layer-wise unfreezing carefully adjusts the feature extractor to find the right balance between model compactness and discriminative power. The DHPS matcher replaces traditional margin-based losses with a calibrated probabilistic output that is optimized through binary cross-entropy. Our system gets the best results on three different public finger-vein datasets, with Equal Error Rates (EER) of 0.002, 0.067, and 0.075 on the FV-USM, UTFVP, and VERA datasets, respectively. It also has F1-scores of 99.8%, 95.6%, and 91.3% on their test sets. These results are possible because the model is small and can be used on embedded platforms with fast inference. In addition, the pre-trained extractor will be made available to the public to encourage more research in the future. This work improves practical finger-vein biometrics by making them more accurate, flexible, and efficient, which gets around major obstacles to their use in the real world.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.