ArticleScientific reports2025
Staged identification of CAP in fever patients across epidemic environments: modeling & validation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Diagnosing community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) relies on costly imaging, posing challenges in resource-limited settings. Traditional tools focus on diagnostic tests for clinicians rather than patient use. Additionally, classification of subtypes in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) lacks criteria. We developed a multimodal fusion model using machine learning algorithms and clinical variables from basic information, medical records, and lab tests to assess CAP risk in fever patients. The model integrates top-performing models via ensemble learning to predict pneumonia probability. We trained on 2,193 visits at Beijing Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital's fever clinic from Dec 2021 to Dec 2022, and validated on 300 visits from Jan to July 2024. Use unsupervised learning to classify subtypes. The training cohort included 1,781 CAP and similar patients, with 210 in the external validation cohort. CAPs were diagnosed via chest CT. The α model, based on pre-visit medical records, performed well (AUC
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.