ArticleScientific reports2025
Evaluation of a nanosecond dissipative soliton resonance fiber laser for multiphoton microscopy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of a nanosecond dissipative soliton resonance fiber laser for multiphoton microscopy.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multiphoton microscopy often relies on femtosecond lasers due to their high peak powers and short pulse durations. However, these systems (e.g., Ti:Sapphire) are expensive, complex, and require dispersion compensation to maintain pulse parameters in the sample plane. Nanosecond sources, such as dissipative soliton resonance (DSR) lasers, offer a compact, low-cost, fully fiber-based alternative that eliminates the need for dispersion management due to their longer pulse durations. Here, we demonstrate the use of a DSR laser for multiphoton imaging. The system delivers 1064 nm nanosecond pulses at a 2 MHz repetition rate. We show that high-quality images can be obtained using a non-complex laser source by optimizing the peak and average power of the DSR laser pulses. Comparative experiments with a femtosecond laser demonstrate that similar fluorescence levels can be achieved from the same sample, while also highlighting the strong impact of dispersion on femtosecond pulses compared to the robustness of nanosecond pulses. We present the first demonstration of the application of a DSR laser in multiphoton microscopy, showing that it is a viable alternative for more complex sources, expanding access to the technique in less demanding environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.