ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2025
Application of risk prediction model to evaluate the effect of mechanical ventilation on postoperative pulmonary complications in thoracic surgery.
Article in European journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Correction: Application of risk prediction model to evaluate the effect of mechanical ventilation on postoperative pulmonary complications in thoracic surgery.European journal of medical research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis retrospective cohort study aimed to systematically evaluate the impact of different mechanical ventilation strategies on postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) in thoracic surgery and to establish a risk prediction model that facilitates high-risk patient identification and perioperative management.
methodsA total of 300 patients undergoing thoracic surgery at a tertiary hospital were enrolled. Demographic data, perioperative indicators, and mechanical ventilation parameters were collected. Potential risk factors were initially identified by univariate analyses and then entered into multivariable logistic regression and machine learning models (random forest and XGBoost) for model training and evaluation. The primary outcome was the incidence and types of PPCs, and the predictive performances of different models were compared.
resultsPPCs occurred in 38.7% of the 300 patients included in the final analysis. Both univariate and multivariate analyses indicated that higher tidal volume, lower positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), higher plateau pressure, and prolonged ventilation duration were positively associated with an increased risk of PPCs. Conversely, pulmonary protective ventilation strategies and recruitment maneuvers had a significant protective effect. The logistic regression model demonstrated an AUC of 0.60, with key variables including tidal volume (OR = 2.119, 95%CI 1.362-3.294), PEEP level (OR = 1.570, 95%CI 1.180-2.088), and plateau pressure (OR = 1.984, 95%CI 1.202-3.276) as significant predictors. Compared with traditional logistic regression and random forest models, the XGBoost model showed moderate performance with potential clinical utility, with a sensitivity and specificity of approximately 0.70 and 0.48, respectively, and an AUC of 0.56. Feature importance analyses revealed that ventilation-related variables (e.g., tidal volume, PEEP, plateau pressure, and total ventilation time) carried substantial weight in predicting PPCs.
conclusionAdopting pulmonary protective ventilation strategies--such as low tidal volume, appropriate PEEP, and recruitment maneuvers--significantly reduces the risk of PPCs in patients undergoing thoracic surgery. Machine learning algorithms like XGBoost may assist in identifying high-risk patients and tailoring individualized ventilation management. Further applications of multicenter big data and real-time monitoring technologies may help optimize mechanical ventilation strategies and improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.