Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41413577›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2025

Development and validation of an interpretable clinical scoring model to monitor the progression of preclinical Alzheimer's disease.

Chenyin Chu, Yihan Wang, Liwei Ma, Youjian Ouyang, Georgios Zisis, Colin L Masters, Benjamin Goudey, Liang Jin, Yijun Pan, A4 and LEARN Study Teams

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Chenyin ChuSchool of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.
Yihan WangSchool of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.
Liwei MaSchool of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.
Youjian OuyangFlorey Department of Neuroscience and Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
Georgios ZisisDepartment of Cardiology, Northern Hospital, Epping, VIC, 3076, Australia.
Colin L MastersFlorey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia.
Benjamin GoudeyAustralian Biocommons, The University of Melbourne, North Melbourne, VIC, 3051, Australia.
Liang JinSchool of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia. liang.jin@monash.edu.
Yijun PanSchool of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia. Yijun.pan@monash.edu.
A4 and LEARN Study Teams

Funding

Alzheimer's Association 23AARF-1020292National Health and Medical Research Council GNT2007912
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMonitoring the progression of preclinical Alzheimer's disease (AD) is challenging due to the absence of obvious cognitive impairment, yet it's crucial for determining the optimal timing for disease-modifying treatments.

methodsThis prognostic study used data from the Anti-Amyloid Treatment in Asymptomatic Alzheimer’s Disease (A4) study. The development cohort included 412 participants from the placebo arm, and external validation was performed using 342 participants from the treatment arm. All participants had baseline brain amyloid-beta (Aβ) positron emission tomography (PET) standardized uptake value ratios (SUVR) below 1.4. Using the AutoScore machine learning framework, we developed two interpretable models: the AutoScore Amyloid-Beta (ASAB) model to predict Aβ accumulation (> 1.4 SUVR) and the AutoScore Phosphorylated Tau (ASPT) model to predict plasma phosphorylated tau-217 (pTau-217) elevation (> 0.3 pg/mL) over 4.5 years. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

resultsThe ASAB model achieved an AUC-ROC of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.79–0.95), and the ASPT model achieved 0.86 (95% CI, 0.78–0.94). Modified models excluding baseline Aβ SUVR or pTau-217 values maintained a strong performance (AUC-ROC 0.76–0.82). External validation demonstrated a robust performance, with an AUC-ROC of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.78–0.87) for ASAB and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.80–0.89) for ASPT. Key predictors included baseline biomarker levels, cholesterol, platelet count, alanine transaminase, and creatine kinase.

conclusionsThe AutoScore-based models accurately predict longitudinal Aβ and pTau-217 levels using readily available clinical and laboratory data. These interpretable tools could help clinicians and researchers monitor preclinical AD progression and identify optimal windows for intervention.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseDisease ProgressionAgedAmyloid beta-PeptidesBiomarkersBrainFemaleHumansMachine LearningMalePositron-Emission TomographyPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsProdromal SymptomsPrognosistau ProteinsAmyloid beta-PeptidesBiomarkerstau ProteinsAmyloid-betaAutoScoreMachine learningPhosphorylated tau-217Plasma biomarkersPreclinical Alzheimer’s diseasePrognostic modeling

Identifiers

PMID41413577
PMCPMC12750953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.