Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41413568›Full record

ArticleTrials2025

A comparison of the clinical effectiveness of pretreatment olive oil administered as drops versus spray prior to earwax removal by microsuction in adults: a protocol for a cluster randomised control trial.

Linor Llwyd Jones, Kevin Munro, Jane Wild

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Linor Llwyd JonesBetsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Bangor, UK. Linor.ll.jones@wales.nhs.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-6603-5386
Kevin MunroThe University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Jane WildBetsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Bangor, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExcessive earwax causes unwanted symptoms such as hearing loss, tinnitus, discomfort and changes in the quality of one's own voice. The NHS Audiology Wax Removal Service in North Wales recommends the use of olive oil as a pretreatment wax softener administered as either drops or spray prior to microsuction. For one in four patients microsuction is unsuccessful at the first attempt. Anecdotal evidence suggests that the administration of olive oil as a spray is a more effective pretreatment. This trial aims to explore whether administering olive oil pretreatment softener is more effective when administered as drops or spray.

methodsThis two-arm cluster randomised control trial will be conducted within the existing NHS Audiology wax removal service in North Wales from January to July 2025. This pragmatic trial involves 26 NHS GP practices (clusters) and compares the administration methods of olive oil pretreatment via drops and spray. A sample size of 1,742 participants (67 in each of the 26 practices) was calculated as sufficient to determine a clinically significant difference. Presumed consent is used for all eligible patients seen within the wax removal service. Patients will be advised to source and self-administer three drops or sprays of olive oil for seven days before attending a wax removal microsuction appointment with an audiology practitioner where routine anonymized data will be collected. The primary outcome is whether wax removal is successful, as assessed via visual examination. The secondary outcomes include: improvements in self-reported symptoms, the amount of residual wax following microsuction and the number of adverse events. Statistical analyses will be conducted with an intention-to-treat design to compare outcomes between the groups. DISCUSSION: This RCT aims to investigate whether administering olive oil as a pretreatment wax softener via drops or spray affects the outcome of wax removal. The outcome of this trial will inform future recommendations to patients and improve service effectiveness and efficiency by reducing the need for repeat visits. The results will be shared nationally and used to inform national guidance on wax removal.

trial registrationISRCTN, ISRCTN28211073. Registered 23 December 2024, https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN28211073?q=earwax&filters=&sort=&offset=1&totalResults=3&page=1&pageSize=10 .

Indexed as

CerumenOlive OilAdultHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeWalesOlive OilCerumenolyticEarwaxMicrosuctionOlive oilWax removalWax softener

Identifiers

PMID41413568
PMCPMC12831375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.