Trial reportBMC oral health2025
Clinical performance of single shade universal resin composites: a randomized controlled one year follow-up study.
Trial report in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06563128 (Evaluation of the Clinical Success of Single Colour Universal Resin Composites), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of the Clinical Success of Single Colour Universal Resin Composites
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effect of Simulated Toothbrushing on Surface Roughness, Color Stability, and Gloss of Two Single-Shade Composite Resins.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis randomized controlled clinical study aimed to evaluate the one year clinical performance of single shade universal resin composites in Class II restorations according to the World Dental Federation (FDI) criteria. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 180 Class II restorations were placed in 62 patients using four different single-shade universal composites (Charisma Diamond One, Vittra APS Unique, Omnichroma, and Zenchroma) and one conventional composite (Clearfil Majesty Posterior), randomly assigned via random.org. Enamel margins were selectively etched with phosphoric acid, followed by application of Scotchbond Universal Plus adhesive. Clinical evaluations were performed at baseline (1 week), 6 months, and 12 months by two independent examiners according to the FDI criteria (scores 1-5). Data were analyzed using the Shapiro-Wilk test (p < 0.05), Friedman test, and Kruskal-Wallis test (α = 0.05).
resultsAll materials demonstrated clinically acceptable performance over 12 months in terms of fracture/retention, marginal adaptation, proximal contact, occlusion, wear, secondary caries, tooth integrity, postoperative sensitivity, and surface texture (p > 0.05). Only Charisma Diamond One maintained color stability without significant changes (p > 0.05), whereas the other materials exhibited statistically significant deterioration in color matching and marginal staining (p < 0.05). Intergroup differences were observed only in the color match parameter at 6 and 12 months (p = 0.001).
conclusionWithin the limitations of this study, single-shade universal composites demonstrated satisfactory one-year clinical performance and may be considered effective alternatives to conventional composites in Class II restorations. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Single-shade composites provide a simplified yet clinically reliable approach for posterior restorations.
trial registrationUS National Library of Medicine, www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov , ID: NCT06563128. Registered on 2024/08/20. Clinical Success of Single Color Universal Resin Composites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.