ArticleBMC medical education2025
Expanding recruitment to medical school: the motivations for and perceived barriers to entry of non-science entrants to a graduate-entry medical course: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- (How) does majoring in the social sciences and humanities relate to specialty choice?: a cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEntering medical school as a graduate is an increasingly well-worn route to becoming a doctor in the UK. Recent expansion in medical school places and four-year graduate-entry (GEM) programmes will likely further increase the number of medical students with a previous degree. A growing number of GEM courses accept graduates with an undergraduate degree in a 'non-science' subject. However, the pre-entry and application experiences of these entrants to GEM degrees in the UK remain under-explored. In the context of expanding medical school places to applicants with increasingly diverse educational backgrounds, we investigated this cohort's motivations for studying medicine and perceived barriers to entry into medical school.
methods12 semi-structured interviews were conducted with students on the GEM MBChB programme at Warwick Medical School (WMS). We applied descriptive thematic analysis to the data, coding verbatim transcripts to generate themes.
resultsOverarching themes for motivations were: educational, professional and personal factors. These were divided into sub-themes: educational factors were categorised as occurring at school, university or postgraduation. Professional factors included the transferability of existing skills and experience, and the perceived job satisfaction, career stability and progression of a career in medicine, which participants contrasted with previous professional experiences. Personal factors included changing direction during the COVID-19 pandemic, experiences as (a friend/relative of) a patient and influence from others. Participants reported several perceived barriers to entry into medical school: demanding entrance tests and eligibility requirements, lack of awareness about programmes accepting non-science graduates, academic anxieties, and a fear of falling behind in 'life stages'.
conclusionsAdditional obstacles to entry into medical school faced by non-science graduates undermine their potential as future doctors. Reviewing entrance requirements and distributing recruitment material to non-science graduates could dismantle some of these barriers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.