Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41413498›Full record

Trial reportBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025

Randomized trial assessing transverse supraumbilical incisions for cesarean sections in morbid obese women with pannus.

Rasha Medhat AbdElhady, Ahmed Sherif Abdel Hamid, Helmy Motawea El Sayed, Shreif Fathi El Mekkawi, Hend Mahmoud Abdel Fattah Elhossary, Ahmed Mohamed El Kotb

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02692729 (Transverse Supraumbilical Versus Pfannenstiel Incision For Cesarean Section in Morbid Obese Patients" A Single Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial"), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02692729 nacompletednot on this map

Transverse Supraumbilical Versus Pfannenstiel Incision For Cesarean Section in Morbid Obese Patients" A Single Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial"

TypeinterventionalSponsorAin Shams UniversityRan2016 to 2018Enrolled72ConditionsCesarean SectionArmstransverse supraumbilical, pfannenstiel incision
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rasha Medhat AbdElhadyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Ahmed Sherif Abdel HamidDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt. ahmedsherif@med.asu.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8495-5909
Helmy Motawea El SayedDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Shreif Fathi El MekkawiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Hend Mahmoud Abdel Fattah ElhossaryDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Helwan University, Helwan, Egypt.
Ahmed Mohamed El KotbDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveThe high prevalence of Morbidly obese Egyptian patients presents surgical problems for cesarean sections (CS), including a higher risk of wound infections. This study examines the impact of a transverse supraumbilical (TSU) incision in these patients. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe conducted a randomized controlled trial on 72 morbidly obese patients (BMI >40 kg/m²) scheduled for cesarean section at Ain Shams University Hospital from March 2016 to August 2018. Participants were divided into Group A (36 patients) with a transverse supraumbilical (TSU) incision and Group B (36 patients) with a conventional Pfannenstiel incision. The primary outcome measured was the incidence of wound infection, while secondary outcomes included operative time, postoperative pain, hospital stay, blood loss, postoperative mobility, and intestinal motility.

resultsThe results indicated no significant differences between the groups regarding age, BMI, parity, diabetes mellitus, and history of previous cesarean sections. The incidence of surgical site infection was significantly lower in the transverse supraumbilical group (11.1%, 4/36) compared to the Pfannenstiel group (58.3%, 21/36), with an absolute risk reduction of 47.2% (95% CI: 27.8% to 66.6%). Other parameters like operative time, hematocrit drop, pain score, hospital stay, and intestinal motility showed no significant differences between the groups (P>0.05).

conclusionSupraumbilical transverse incisions are a safe, effective alternative to Pfannenstiel incisions in morbidly obese women, with better wound infection rates and easier access. Further research is needed to confirm the benefits and to assess patient satisfaction.

trial registrationThis study was registered prospectively in clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02692729) on 1.3.2016.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionObesity, MorbidSurgical Wound InfectionAdultBlood Loss, SurgicalEgyptFemaleHumansLength of StayOperative TimePostoperative PainPregnancyTreatment OutcomeUmbilicusCesarean sectionMorbid obesePfannenstiel incisionRandomized controlled trialTransverse supraumbilical incision

Identifiers

PMID41413498
PMCPMC12849629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.