ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025
Smoking history is not independently associated with broad-spectrum antibiotic use in two nationally representative cohorts of adult men in South Korea.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSmoking is linked to an increased risk of infectious diseases, underscoring the importance of smoking prevention and cessation in improving public health. However, using smoking history as a surrogate marker of infection severity may have unintended consequences, potentially prompting clinicians to prescribe broad-spectrum antibiotics more readily for patients with a history of smoking. This study evaluated whether smoking history was independently associated with the increased prescription of broad-spectrum antibiotics to adult men in the general population of South Korea.
methodsWe analyzed data from two nationally representative cohorts of Korean adult men enrolled in the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS): the National Sample Cohort (NSC) and the Health Screening Cohort (HEALS). Smoking status was classified using data from self-reported questionnaires collected from 2009 to 2013. Participants were followed from 2013 to 2021 to assess broad-spectrum antibiotic use. The primary outcome was the receipt of at least one prescription of antipseudomonal penicillins, antipseudomonal cephalosporins, carbapenems, or glycopeptides for at least 3 consecutive days. We used a composite outcome to assess the use of antibiotics targeting resistant Gram-negative organisms. After accounting for confounders, the association between smoking status and antibiotic use was evaluated using multivariable regression models.
resultsThe NHIS–NSC cohort included 50,134 adult men (17,300 never-smokers and 32,834 smokers), and the NHIS–HEALS cohort included 42,979 adult men (20,145 never-smokers and 22,834 smokers). In both cohorts, the rate of prescription of broad-spectrum antibiotics was low. For the composite outcome, the adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRR) for smokers compared to never-smokers were 1.55 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.67–3.52) in NHIS–NSC and 0.59 (95% CI = 0.24–1.46) in NHIS–HEALS. Smoking history was not significantly associated with the use of different antibiotic subclasses in these cohorts. For glycopeptides, the adjusted IRRs were 1.07 (95% CI = 0.23–5.10) in NHIS–NSC and 3.47 (95% CI = 0.70–17.13) in NHIS–HEALS, and neither association was statistically significant.
conclusionIn these two cohorts, the prescription rates of broad-spectrum antibiotics were low, and we did not observe evidence of an independent association between smoking history and their use. These findings suggest that smoking history alone should not be regarded as sufficient justification for prescribing broad-spectrum agents and emphasize the importance of basing prescribing decisions on comprehensive clinical assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.