ReviewNature reviews. Disease primers2025
Buruli ulcer.
Review in Nature reviews. Disease primers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biological, Environmental, and Social Determinants of Buruli Ulcer in Africa: Their Interplay Across Disease Severity and Patient Outcome.Public health challenges · 2026Review
- Buruli ulcer in Africa: between innovation and pragmatism.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026Article
- Assessing the acceptability of photographs and medical illustrations in Buruli ulcer health communication among health providers, community volunteers and community members in endemic districts of Ghana.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Buruli ulcer is a slowly progressive necrotizing disease of the skin caused by Mycobacterium ulcerans, recognized by WHO as a neglected tropical disease. Around 2,000 cases are reported annually, but underdiagnosis and under-reporting probably obscure the true burden. A major advance in the understanding of Buruli ulcer pathogenesis was the discovery that mycolactone, a lipid-like exotoxin secreted by M. ulcerans, inhibits the Sec61 translocon, driving tissue destruction and immune suppression. M. ulcerans is an opportunistic environmental pathogen; however, its mechanisms of transmission remain unclear in most regions. PCR is the current gold standard for diagnosis, but its cost and technical demands limit use in resource-limited settings. Treatment is available with an oral regimen of rifampicin plus clarithromycin for 8 weeks, but further research is in progress to explore alternative drugs, optimized dosing and duration, and improved affordability. Adjunctive wound care, management of paradoxical reactions and rehabilitation, including physiotherapy and psychosocial support, are essential components of Buruli ulcer management. Future efforts should focus on elucidating transmission pathways to inform prevention, developing rapid diagnostics, refining and adapting drug regimens for diverse clinical presentations and patient groups, and advancing wound care. Strengthening healthcare worker training and integrating Buruli ulcer control with that of other skin diseases will enhance accessibility to early diagnosis and treatment, prevent disabilities and deformities, and reduce stigma, ultimately ensuring better quality of life for affected individuals worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41413430What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.