Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41413418›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2025

Comparison of post-operative pain prevalence after single visit endodontic treatment with two NiTi rotary files - a randomized clinical trial.

M E Khallaf, Yousra Aly, Amira Ibrahim Mohamed

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06777381 (Comparison of Post-Operative Pain Occurrence After Single Visit Root Canal Treatment with Two NiTi Rotary Files - a Randomized Clinical Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06777381 naenrolling by invitationnot on this map

Comparison of Post-Operative Pain Occurrence After Single Visit Root Canal Treatment with Two NiTi Rotary Files - a Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Research Centre, EgyptRan2024 to 2025Enrolled80ConditionsSymptomatic Irreversible PulpitisArmssingle visit root canal treatment using ProTaper Universal rotary system, single visit root canal treatment using M-Pro rotary system
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

M E KhallafRestorative and Dental Materials Department, National Research Centre, Dokki, Giza, Egypt.
Yousra AlyRestorative and Dental Materials Department, National Research Centre, Dokki, Giza, Egypt.
Amira Ibrahim MohamedRestorative and Dental Materials Department, National Research Centre, Dokki, Giza, Egypt. ai.ibrahim@nrc.sci.eg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In root canal treatment, post-operative endodontic pain is considered as a common post-operative complication. Knowledge about its causes helps the clinician in proper instrument and technique selection to decrease its incidence. Therefore, the aim of this randomized clinical trial was to compare the post-operative pain occurrence after single visit root canal preparation using ProTaper Universal rotary system or M-Pro rotary system. Eighty patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in mandibular first molars were allocated into two groups. In group A (n = 40): root canal preparation was performed using ProTaper Universal system and in group B (n = 40): root canal preparation was performed using M-Pro rotary system. Pain level was assessed by the patient using the numerical rating scale (NRS) at 24 h and 7 days postoperatively. The patients were advised to take the prescribed analgesics in case of emergency need. Data and statistical analysis showed that there was significant decrease in pain in both groups after 24 h and after 7 days. Insignificant difference was found between ProTaper Universal group and M-Pro group after 24 h and after 7 days. Insignificant difference was found in analgesics intake between both groups after 24 h and after 7 days.Trial registration: The trial protocol was registered at https://ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06777381), registered January 15, 2024.

Indexed as

NickelPostoperative PainRoot Canal PreparationRoot Canal TherapyTitaniumAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMolarPain MeasurementPrevalencePulpitisYoung AdultNickelTitaniumtitanium nickelideM-ProPost-operative painProTaperSingle visit

Identifiers

PMID41413418
PMCPMC12717174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.