Trial reportScientific reports2025
Comparison of post-operative pain prevalence after single visit endodontic treatment with two NiTi rotary files - a randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06777381 (Comparison of Post-Operative Pain Occurrence After Single Visit Root Canal Treatment with Two NiTi Rotary Files - a Randomized Clinical Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison of Post-Operative Pain Occurrence After Single Visit Root Canal Treatment with Two NiTi Rotary Files - a Randomized Clinical Trial
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In root canal treatment, post-operative endodontic pain is considered as a common post-operative complication. Knowledge about its causes helps the clinician in proper instrument and technique selection to decrease its incidence. Therefore, the aim of this randomized clinical trial was to compare the post-operative pain occurrence after single visit root canal preparation using ProTaper Universal rotary system or M-Pro rotary system. Eighty patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in mandibular first molars were allocated into two groups. In group A (n = 40): root canal preparation was performed using ProTaper Universal system and in group B (n = 40): root canal preparation was performed using M-Pro rotary system. Pain level was assessed by the patient using the numerical rating scale (NRS) at 24 h and 7 days postoperatively. The patients were advised to take the prescribed analgesics in case of emergency need. Data and statistical analysis showed that there was significant decrease in pain in both groups after 24 h and after 7 days. Insignificant difference was found between ProTaper Universal group and M-Pro group after 24 h and after 7 days. Insignificant difference was found in analgesics intake between both groups after 24 h and after 7 days.Trial registration: The trial protocol was registered at https://ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06777381), registered January 15, 2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.