Trial reportInternational orthopaedics2026
Vibration-stimulation device-assisted enhanced recovery after lower limb fracture surgery: A randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in International orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveIn the context of the widespread implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in orthopaedics, postoperative supportive interventions for patients with lower limb fractures remain limited. This study aimed to introduce a vibration-stimulation device designed in accordance with ERAS principles and to evaluate its clinical effectiveness.
methodsThis prospective randomized controlled trial consecutively screened 1,241 patients aged 18-75 years with lower limb fractures admitted to a tertiary university-affiliated orthopaedic hospital between January and December 2024, of whom 707 met the inclusion criteria. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio by a random number table to a vibration group or a blank control group. The primary outcomes were the seven day postoperative pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score and the incidence of lower limb deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Secondary outcomes were radiographic fracture-healing time and postoperative functional scores. The primary analysis followed the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle, comparing all randomized patients with available outcome data according to their original allocation, and a per-protocol (PP) sensitivity analysis was additionally performed.
resultsA total of 707 patients completed six to 12 months of follow-up and were included in the ITT analysis (350 in the vibration group and 357 in the control group). In the overall population, the seven day postoperative incidence of lower limb DVT was significantly lower in the vibration group than in the control group [10.9% (38/350) vs 22.6% (81/357); absolute risk difference (ARD) = 11.7%]. The seven day postoperative pain scores were lower in the vibration group (weighted mean approximately 5.1 vs 5.7), radiographic fracture-healing time was shorter (approximately 5.2 vs 5.5 months), and functional scores at final follow-up were higher (approximately 127.8 vs 123.2). PP sensitivity analyses yielded results consistent in direction with the ITT analyses, further supporting the robustness of the study conclusions.
conclusionVibration-stimulation therapy facilitates rapid postoperative recovery in patients with lower limb fractures and has a favourable safety profile, and may represent a promising component of postoperative ERAS strategies in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41413326What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.