Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41413313›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Contrasting pathways to tree longevity in gymnosperms and angiosperms.

Roel J W Brienen, Giuliano Maselli Locosselli, Stefan Krottenthaler, Emanuel Gloor, Robyn Wrigley, Steven L Voelker, Jan Altman, Nela Altmanova, Leander D L Anderegg, Michele Baliva and 35 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

45 authors.

Roel J W BrienenSchool of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. r.brienen@leeds.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5397-5755
Giuliano Maselli LocosselliCenter of Nuclear Energy in Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, Brazil.
Stefan KrottenthalerPhysical Geography, University of Passau, Passau, Germany.
Emanuel GloorSchool of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9384-6341
Robyn WrigleySchool of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Steven L VoelkerCollege of Forest Resources and Environmental Science, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, USA.
Jan AltmanInstitute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Třeboň, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4879-5773
Nela AltmanovaInstitute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Třeboň, Czech Republic.
Leander D L AndereggDepartment of Ecology, Evolution & Marine Biology, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5144-7254
Michele BalivaDepartment of ecological and biological science (DEB), Università della Tuscia, Viterbo, Italy.
Deepak BaruaDepartment of Biology, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Pune, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8761-0084
Vaclav BazantFaculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
Bryan BlackLaboratory of Tree Ring Research, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Peter M BrownRocky Mountain Tree-Ring Research, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Gregorio CeccantiniDepartment of Botany, University of São Paulo, Institute of Biosciences, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
R Justin DeRoseDepartment of Wildland Resources and Ecology Center, Logan, UT, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4849-7744
Jose Villanueva DiazLaboratorio de Dendrocronologia, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agricolas y Pecuarias, Gomez Palacio, Mexico.
Alfredo Di FilippoDepartment of Agriculture and Forest Science (DAFNE), Università della Tuscia, Viterbo, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5863-8339
Jiri DolezalInstitute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Třeboň, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5829-4051
Louis DuchesneMinistère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts, Direction de la recherche forestière, Quebec city, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6784-445X
Christopher EarleGymnosperm Database, Olympia, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-3201-6115
Pavel FibichInstitute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Třeboň, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9066-3753
Hardy GriesbauerBritish Columbia Ministry of Forests, Prince George, BC, Canada.
Samuli HelamaNatural Resources Institute Finland, Rovaniemi, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9777-3354
Stefan KlesseForest and Soil Ecology, Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1569-1724
Kirill KorznikovInstitute of Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Třeboň, Czech Republic.
David LindenmayerFenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4766-4088
Shuhui LiuResearch Center of Forest Management Engineering of State Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China.
Lidio LopezLaboratorio de Dendrocronología e Historia Ambiental IANIGLA/CONICET, Mendoza, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5254-9618
Maurizio MencucciniCREAF, Bellaterra, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0840-1477
Thomas A NagelDepartment of forestry and renewable forest resources, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4207-9218
Jakob PavlinFaculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8514-3446
Neil PedersonIndependent Scholar, Maynard, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3830-263X
Gianluca PiovesanDepartment of ecological and biological science (DEB), Università della Tuscia, Viterbo, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3214-0839
Christina RestainoUniversity of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV, USA.
Peter B ReichInstitute for Global Change Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4424-662X
David SauchynPrairie Adaptation Research Collaborative, Geography and Environmental Studies, University of Regina, Regina, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1607-2028
Jochen SchöngartInstituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA), Ecologia, Monitoramento e Uso Sustentável de Áreas Úmidas (MAUA), Manaus, AM, Brazil.
John D ShawRocky Mountain Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Ogden, UT, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5797-1006
Dan SmithDepartment of Geography, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.
Ron SunnyDepartment of Botany, St Joseph's College (Autonomous), Devagiri, Calicut, Kerala, India.
Miroslav SvobodaFaculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4050-3422
Ricardo VillalbaLaboratorio de Dendrocronología e Historia Ambiental IANIGLA/CONICET, Mendoza, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8183-0310
Lisa J WoodUniversity of Northern British Columbia, Faculty of Environment, Prince George, BC, Canada.
Chunyu ZhangResearch Center of Forest Management Engineering of State Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3091-5060

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tree longevity is thought to increase in growth-limiting, adverse environments, but a quantitative assessment of drivers of global variation in tree longevity is lacking. We assemble a global database of maximum longevity for 739 tree species and analyse associations between longevity and climate, soil, and species' functional traits. Our results show two primary pathways towards long lifespans. The first is slow growth in resource-limited environments, consistent with the "adversity begets longevity" paradigm. The second pathway is through relief from abiotic constraints in productive environments. Despite notable exceptions, long-lived gymnosperms tend to follow the first path through slow growth in cold environments, whereas long-lived angiosperms tend to follow the second ("productivity") path reaching maximum longevity generally in humid environments. For angiosperms, we identify two mechanisms for increased longevity under humid conditions. First, higher water availability increases species' maximum tree height which is associated with greater longevities. Secondly, greater water availability increases stand density and inter-tree competition, limiting growth which may increase tree lifespan. The documented differences between gymnosperm and angiosperm longevity are likely rooted in intrinsic differences in hydraulic architecture that provide fitness advantages for gymnosperms under high abiotic stress, and for angiosperms under increased productivity or competition.

Indexed as

CycadopsidaLongevityMagnoliopsidaTreesClimateSoilWaterSoilWater

Identifiers

PMID41413313
PMCPMC12830884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.