ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2026
Primary Care Associated with Improved Life Expectancy in Older US Adults: A Retrospective Cohort Study of National Survey Data.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLimited access to primary care may disproportionately affect older adults, who often have greater chronic disease management and care coordination needs. However, little is known about the effect of having a primary care practitioner (PCP) on longevity in the aging population.
objectiveTo examine the association of having a usual source of primary care with mortality and life expectancy among US adults aged 65 and older.
designRetrospective cohort study, using nationally representative data from the 2000 and 2005 cohorts of the National Health Interview Survey linked with National Death Index records through 2019.
participantsAll respondents aged 65 to 84 (n = 10,873, weighted n = 16,484,914). INTERVENTIONS/EXPOSURES: Having a usual source of primary care. MAIN MEASURES: Using a Cox proportional hazards model, we examined the association between exposure to primary care and 15-year mortality, adjusting for sociodemographic factors and respondent life expectancy (using a validated index). We also used this model to generate survival curves by exposure to primary care and computed median survival times for each group. KEY
resultsOverall, 60.3% of respondents were female, 83.6% were non-Hispanic White, and 6.4% (n = 739, weighted n = 1,056,554) did not have a usual source of primary care. Use of primary care was associated with a lower 15-year mortality risk (aHR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.72-0.98). Median survival time was also at least 2.1 years longer among those who used primary care (> 15 years) compared to those who did not (12.9 years).
conclusionsWe found that primary care use is associated with greater survival among older adults. As the population of adults aged 65 + is growing rapidly, investing in primary care is essential for the health of US older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.