ReviewEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2026
Post-surgical diets in the ERAS protocol: D-ERAS scoping review.
Review in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program emphasizes early oral feeding (EOF) as a key component for faster patient recovery. ERAS guidelines recommend resuming oral feeding within 24 h after surgery, but without specification on diet progression, portion sizes, and macronutrient targets. This scoping review aims to analyze existing postoperative oral feeding protocols (OFPs) across various abdominal surgical procedures. A literature search was conducted via PubMed and Scopus. Articles were assessed for eligibility based on prespecified inclusion criteria. The data were synthesized, and the results were reported and discussed thematically. Sixty-eight articles were included (24 for esophageal and/or gastric surgery, 16 for hepatobiliary or pancreatic, 22 for colorectal, 6 for urologic or gynecologic surgery). Our review found that in many studies oral feeding started much later than recommended by the ERAS guidelines. For colorectal surgery, although a low-residue diet is preferred over clear liquids, only few studies prescribed a solid diet immediately postoperatively. Similarly, for gastric and upper GI surgery, where early oral feeding is encouraged, most studies started with liquids and progressed slowly. In gynecologic and urologic surgeries, although early feeding is safe and recommended, alternative approaches were found. This review analyzed dietary protocols within ERAS pathways and identified significant inconsistencies and non-adherence to the ERAS recommendations. A major issue was the lack of standardized terminology and detailed descriptions of diet composition (energy, nutrients, food types, meal frequency) across studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41413285What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.