Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41413285›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2026

Post-surgical diets in the ERAS protocol: D-ERAS scoping review.

Camilla Fiorindi, Pauline Raoul, Valentina Moretto, Ilaria Trestini, Laura Rossini, Giovanna Colasanto, Rita Schiano di Cola, Silvia Lazzaris, Benedetta Beltrame, Sara Carnevale and 2 more

Abstract readScoping ReviewReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Camilla FiorindiDepartment of Allied Health Professions, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy. camilla.fiorindi@unifi.it.
Pauline RaoulClinical Nutrition Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Valentina MorettoClinical Nutrition Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padua, Italy.ORCID 0009-0000-6267-3647
Ilaria TrestiniDietetic Service, Hospital Medical Direction, University and Hospital Trust (AOUI) of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Laura RossiniDietetic Service, Azienda Sanitaria Territoriale Pesaro Urbino AST, Pesaro, Italy.
Giovanna ColasantoDietitians Area, Simple Departmental Operational Unit for Hospital Diagnostic and Technical Assistance Professions, Health Integrated Agency of Friuli Centrale (ASUFC), Udine, Italy.ORCID 0009-0007-3948-5454
Rita Schiano di ColaDietetic Service, Department of Surgery and Center of excellence for Bariatric surgery, Pineta Grande Hospital, Castel Volturno, Caserta, Italy.
Silvia LazzarisDietetic Service, Hospital Medical Direction, University and Hospital Trust (AOUI) of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID 0009-0007-3381-0076
Benedetta BeltrameDepartment of Technical-Health Care Professions, Dietetics Unit- AUSL, Toscana Centro, Santa Maria Nuova Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Sara CarnevaleSanta Rosa Hospital, Viterbo, Italy.ORCID 0009-0008-7922-5726
Francesco GiudiciDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Luca GianottiDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine and Surgery, IRCCS San Gerardo Hospital, Milano-Bicocca University, Monza, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program emphasizes early oral feeding (EOF) as a key component for faster patient recovery. ERAS guidelines recommend resuming oral feeding within 24 h after surgery, but without specification on diet progression, portion sizes, and macronutrient targets. This scoping review aims to analyze existing postoperative oral feeding protocols (OFPs) across various abdominal surgical procedures. A literature search was conducted via PubMed and Scopus. Articles were assessed for eligibility based on prespecified inclusion criteria. The data were synthesized, and the results were reported and discussed thematically. Sixty-eight articles were included (24 for esophageal and/or gastric surgery, 16 for hepatobiliary or pancreatic, 22 for colorectal, 6 for urologic or gynecologic surgery). Our review found that in many studies oral feeding started much later than recommended by the ERAS guidelines. For colorectal surgery, although a low-residue diet is preferred over clear liquids, only few studies prescribed a solid diet immediately postoperatively. Similarly, for gastric and upper GI surgery, where early oral feeding is encouraged, most studies started with liquids and progressed slowly. In gynecologic and urologic surgeries, although early feeding is safe and recommended, alternative approaches were found. This review analyzed dietary protocols within ERAS pathways and identified significant inconsistencies and non-adherence to the ERAS recommendations. A major issue was the lack of standardized terminology and detailed descriptions of diet composition (energy, nutrients, food types, meal frequency) across studies.

Indexed as

DietEnhanced Recovery After SurgeryPostoperative CareHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.