Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41413269›Full record

ArticleCommunications chemistry2025

ChemFM as a scaling law guided foundation model pre-trained on informative chemicals.

Feiyang Cai, Katelin Zacour, Tianyu Zhu, Tzuen-Rong Tzeng, Yongping Duan, Ling Liu, Srikanth Pilla, Gang Li, Feng Luo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Feiyang CaiSchool of Computing, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.
Katelin ZacourDepartment of Biological Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.
Tianyu ZhuDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9115-6462
Tzuen-Rong TzengDepartment of Biological Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1835-9639
Yongping DuanHorticultural Research Laboratory, USDA, Fort Pierce, FL, USA.
Ling LiuCollege of Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Srikanth PillaCenter for Composite Materials, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3728-6578
Gang LiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.
Feng LuoSchool of Computing, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA. luofeng@clemson.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4813-2403

Funding

DOE | Office of Science (SC) DE-SC0023389
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional AI methods often rely on task-specific model designs and training, which constrain both the scalability of model size and generalization across different tasks. Here, we introduce ChemFM, a large foundation model specifically developed for chemicals. By conducting a series of scaling experiments, we identify UniChem as the informative molecular database for pre-training the foundation model. ChemFM comprises 3 billion parameters and is pre-trained on 178 million molecules using self-supervised causal language modeling to extract generalizable molecular representations. This model can be adapted to diverse downstream chemical applications using either full-parameter or parameter-efficient fine-tuning methods. ChemFM consistently outperforms state-of-the-art task-specific AI models across all tested tasks. Notably, it achieves up to 67.48% performance improvement across 34 property prediction benchmarks, up to 33.80% reduction in mean average deviation between conditioned and actual properties of generated molecules in conditional molecular generation tasks, and up to 3.7% top-1 accuracy improvement across 4 reaction prediction datasets. Moreover, ChemFM demonstrates its superior performance in predicting antibiotic activity and cytotoxicity, highlighting its potential to advance the discovery of novel antibiotics. Furthermore, we demonstrate that, as a foundation model, ChemFM exhibits strong data efficiency, requiring significantly fewer labeled training samples to achieve state-of-the-art performance. We anticipate that ChemFM will significantly advance chemistry research by providing a foundation model capable of effectively generalizing across a broad range of tasks with minimal additional training.

Identifiers

PMID41413269
PMCPMC12764477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.